Cited by 7,127Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsGene expression and cancer classificationRNA Research and Splicing

Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Data: A Model-Based Variance Estimation Approach to Identify Genes Suited for Normalization, Applied to Bladder and Colon Cancer Data Sets

Open access
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg, Jensen, Jens Ledet, Ørntoft, Torben Falck·2004·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate normalization is an absolute prerequisite for correct measurement of gene expression. For quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), the most commonly used normalization strategy involves standardization to a single constitutively expressed control gene. However, in recent years, it has become clear that no single gene is constitutively expressed in all cell types and under all experimental conditions, implying that the expression stability of the intended control gene has to be verified before each experiment. We outline a novel, innovative, and robust strategy to identify stably expressed genes among a set of candidate normalization genes. The strategy is rooted in a mathematical model of gene expression that enables estimation not only of the overall variation of the candidate normalization genes but also of the variation between sample subgroups of the sample set. Notably, the strategy provides a direct measure for the estimated expression variation, enabling the user to evaluate the systematic error introduced when using the gene. In a side-by-side comparison with a previously published strategy, our model-based approach performed in a more robust manner and showed less sensitivity toward coregulation of the candidate normalization genes. We used the model-based strategy to identify genes suited to normalize quantitative RT-PCR data from colon cancer and bladder cancer. These genes are UBC, GAPD, and TPT1 for the colon and HSPCB, TEGT, and ATP5B…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0496

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, C. L., Jensen, J. L., & Ørntoft, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • 1Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark, and
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
64
Issue
15
Pages
5245-5250
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2105423509
Cited by
7,127
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 210 · 2025: 325 · 2024: 390 · 2023: 390 · 2022: 477 · 2021: 524 · 2020: 533 · 2019: 522 · 2018: 522 · 2017: 525 · 2016: 500 · 2015: 452 · 2014: 427 · 2013: 339 · 2012: 290
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
normalization, quantitative real-time RT-PCR, gene expression stability, bladder cancer, colon cancer, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, UBC, TPT1, ATP5B
MeSH terms
Tumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1, Urinary Bladder, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Colon, Colonic Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Neoplasm Proteins, Reference Standards, RNA, Messenger, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Reproducibility of Results, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review