The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews collate and summarise studies of the effects of healthcare interventions. The characteristics of these reviews and the meta-analyses and individual studies they contain provide insights into the nature of healthcare research and important context for the development of relevant statistical and other methods. METHODS: We classified every meta-analysis with at least two studies in every review in the January 2008 issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) according to the medical specialty, the types of interventions being compared and the type of outcome. We provide descriptive statistics for numbers of meta-analyses, numbers of component studies and sample sizes of component studies, broken down by these categories. RESULTS: We included 2321 reviews containing 22,453 meta-analyses, which themselves consist of data from 112,600 individual studies (which may appear in more than one meta-analysis). Meta-analyses in the areas of gynaecology, pregnancy and childbirth (21%), mental health (13%) and respiratory diseases (13%) are well represented in the CDSR. Most meta-analyses address drugs, either with a control or placebo group (37%) or in a comparison with another drug (25%). The median number of meta-analyses per review is six (inter-quartile range 3 to 12). The median number of studies included in the meta-analyses with at least two studies is three (inter-quartile range 2 to 6). Sample sizes of individual studies range from 2 to 1,242,071, with a median of 91 participants. DISCUSSION: It is clear that the numbers of studies eligible for meta-analyses are typically very small for all medical areas, outcomes and interventions covered by Cochrane reviews. This highlights the particular importance of suitable methods for the meta-analysis of small data sets. There was little variation in number of studies per meta-analysis across medical areas, across outcome data types or across types of interventions being compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the majority of published meta-analyses contain ten or fewer studies (48) .”
From Effects of low-carbohydrate diets v. low-fat diets on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2016) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“although small numbers appear to be typical [38”
From Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Altogether, these are common statistical limitations of most meta-analyses (Davey et al., 2011;Ioannidis et al., 2007).”
From Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2019) · cites this paper as Davey et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
Carlisle, J. B., & Stevenson, C. A. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004125.pub2 · Cited by 265
RetractedDrugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
Carlisle, J. B., & Stevenson, C. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004125.pub3 · Cited by 244
RetractedMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Self-citationPharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults
Kleinstäuber, M., Witthöft, M., Steffanowski, A., van Marwijk, H., Hiller, W., & Lambert, M. J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010628.pub2 · Cited by 11,369
The cochrane database of systematic reviews
Geddes, J. R. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)90063-x · Cited by 5,988
A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00552.x · Cited by 2,569
Self-citationWood, L., Egger, M., Gluud, L. L., Schulz, K. F., Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., Gluud, C., Martin, R. M., Wood, A. J. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.ad · Cited by 2,538
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
Moher, D., Tetzlaff, J., Tricco, A. C., Sampson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078 · Cited by 891
Turner, R. M., Davey, J., Clarke, M. J., Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys041 · Cited by 837
Self-citationTechniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Cyna, A. M., Andrew, M. I., Emmett, R. S., Middleton, P., & Simmons, S. W. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub2 · Cited by 424
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Higgins JPT, Green Se: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. 2009, The Cochrane Collaboration
- Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]. Version 5.0. 2008, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration
- Wood L: The epidemiology of bias in randomized (clinical) controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study. 2006, University of Bristol
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial
Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019) · Evidence Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117 · Cited by 5,827
IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., & Borm, G. F. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-25 · Cited by 2,419
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
Williamson, P. R., Altman, D. G., Bagley, H., Barnes, K. L., Blazeby, J. M., Brookes, S. T., Clarke, M., Gargon, E., Gorst, S., Harman, N., et al. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4 · Cited by 2,011
Self-citationCompas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., Williams, E., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000110 · Cited by 1,555
The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses
von Hippel, P. T. (2015) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z · Cited by 1,229
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses
Langan, D., Higgins, J. P. T., Jackson, D., Bowden, J., Veroniki, A. A., Kontopantelis, E., Viechtbauer, W., & Simmonds, M. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1316 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationRueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000058 · Cited by 946
Turner, R. M., Davey, J., Clarke, M. J., Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys041 · Cited by 837
Self-citationBarnett, D. W., Barnett, A. H., Nathan, A., Cauwenberg, J. V., & Cerin, E. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z · Cited by 848
The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews
Turner, R. M., Bird, S. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059202 · Cited by 672
Self-citationCerin, E., Nathan, A., Cauwenberg, J. V., Barnett, D. W., & Barnett, A. H. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5 · Cited by 645
A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery
Dodd, S., Clarke, M., Becker, L., Mavergames, C., Fish, R., & Williamson, P. R. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.020 · Cited by 625
Self-citationPower analysis for random-effects meta-analysis
Jackson, D., & Turner, R. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1240 · Cited by 619
Self-citationAcademic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice
Hyland, K. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 · Cited by 537
Cooke, R. W. I., Dahdah, M., Norman, P. E., & French, D. (2014) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.947547 · Cited by 522
Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
de Witte, M., Pinho, A. D. S., Stams, G.-J., Moonen, X., Bos, A. E. R., & van Hooren, S. (2022) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1846580 · Cited by 444
Mansoor, N., Vinknes, K. J., Veierød, M. B., & Retterstøl, K. (2016) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114515004699 · Cited by 439
Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: A meta-analysis
Vannucci, A., Simpson, E. G., Gagnon, S., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.014 · Cited by 410
Turner, R. M., Jackson, D., Wei, Y., Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6381 · Cited by 410
Self-citationRhodes, K. M., Turner, R., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.012 · Cited by 398
Self-citationLara, E., Martín-María, N., De la Torre-Luque, A., Koyanagi, A., Vancampfort, D., Izquierdo, A., & Miret, M. (2019) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2019.03.002 · Cited by 351
Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes
Lin, L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204056 · Cited by 354
Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Using the bayesmeta R Package
Röver, C. (2020) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v093.i06 · Cited by 310
Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis
McKenzie, J. E., Brennan, S., Ryan, R. E., Thomson, H., Johnston, R. V., & Thomas, J. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119536604.ch3 · Cited by 391
Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
López‐López, J. A., Page, M. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1310 · Cited by 294
Self-citationSherman, D. S., Mauser, J., Nuno, M. A., & Sherzai, D. (2017) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3 · Cited by 301
Rao, G., López-Jiménez, F. A., Boyd, J. H., D’Amico, F., Durant, N. H., Hlatky, M. A., Howard, G., Kirley, K., Masi, C. M., Powell‐Wiley, T. M., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000523 · Cited by 275
Corbett, M. S., Higgins, J. P. T., & Woolacott, N. F. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1090 · Cited by 273
Self-citationJackson, D., Law, M. W.-M., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7411 · Cited by 259
O’Brien, K. K., Tynan, A., Nixon, S., & Glazier, R. H. (2016) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1478-2 · Cited by 257
A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis
Cheung, M. W.-L., & Vijayakumar, R. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9319-z · Cited by 239
Veroniki, A. A., Jackson, D., Bender, R., Kuss, O., Langan, D., Higgins, J. P. T., Knapp, G., & Salanti, G. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1319 · Cited by 236
Self-citationA comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
Jackson, D., Law, M. W.-M., Stijnen, T., Viechtbauer, W., & White, I. R. (2018) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7588 · Cited by 209
Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta‐analysis
Lin, L. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13159 · Cited by 186
Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis
Louie, K. S., Seigneurin, A., Cathcart, P. J., & Sasieni, P. D. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu525 · Cited by 184
Hendriks, T., de Jong, J. T. V. M., & Cramer, H. (2017) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2016.0334 · Cited by 181
A historical review of publication bias
Marks‐Anglin, A., & Chen, Y. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1452 · Cited by 165
Cheng, J., Pullenayegum, E., Marshall, J. K., Iorio, A., & Thabane, L. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010983 · Cited by 163
Depression and sleep quality in older adults: a meta-analysis
Becker, N. B., Jesus, S. N., João, K. A. D. R., Viseu, J. N., & Martins, R. I. S. (2017) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2016.1274042 · Cited by 162
Laghi, A., Bellini, D., Rengo, M., Accarpio, F., Caruso, D., Biacchi, D., Giorgio, A. D., & Sammartino, P. (2016) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-016-0682-x · Cited by 164
Fixed- and Random-Effects Models
Kanters, S. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_3 · Cited by 160
Su, K., Tseng, P., Lin, P., Okubo, R., Chen, T., Chen, Y., & Matsuoka, Y. (2018) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2327 · Cited by 164
Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Dzhambov, A. M., & Lercher, P. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16214134 · Cited by 151
Prussien, K. V., Jordan, L. C., DeBaun, M. R., & Compas, B. E. (2019) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsz031 · Cited by 152
Langan, D., Higgins, J. P. T., & Simmonds, M. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1198 · Cited by 149
Self-citationConducting Meta-analyses of Proportions in R
Wang, N. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Data Science · doi:10.35566/jbds/v3n2/wang · Cited by 144
Lin, L., Chu, H., & Hodges, J. S. (2016) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12543 · Cited by 140
Kilian, C., O'Donnell, A. J., Potapova, N., López‐Pelayo, H., Schulte, B., Miquel, L., Paniello-Castillo, B., Schmidt, C. S., Gual, A., Rehm, J. T., et al. (2022) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.13446 · Cited by 141
Association between residential greenness and birth weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Dzhambov, A. M., Dimitrova, D., & Dimitrakova, E. D. (2014) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.004 · Cited by 146
Mayo-Wilson, E., Fusco, N., Li, T., Hong, H., Canner, J. K., & Dickersin, K. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.007 · Cited by 131
Meta‐analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases
Friede, T., Röver, C., Wandel, S., & Neuenschwander, B. (2017) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.201500236 · Cited by 128
A comparison of methods for meta‐analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes
Mathes, T., & Kuß, O. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1296 · Cited by 136
O’Brien, K. K., Tynan, A., Nixon, S., & Glazier, R. H. (2017) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2342-8 · Cited by 134
Tseng, P.-T., Cheng, Y.-S., Yen, C.-F., Chen, Y.-W., Stubbs, B., Whiteley, P., Carvalho, A. F., Li, D.-J., Chen, T.-Y., Yang, W.-C., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-19096-x · Cited by 126
Taichi exercise for self-rated sleep quality in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Du, S., Dong, J., Zhang, H., Jin, S., Xu, G., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Yin, H., & Sun, Z. (2014) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.009 · Cited by 127
Random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies involving rare events
Günhan, B. K., Röver, C., & Friede, T. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1370 · Cited by 122
Epidural Injections for Spinal Pain
Bicket, M. C., Gupta, A., Brown, C. H., & Cohen, S. P. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31829c2ddd · Cited by 117
Park, I., Gong, J., Lyons, G. L., Hirota, T., Takahashi, M., Kim, B., Lee, S.-Y., Kim, Y. S., Lee, J.-S., & LEVENTHAL, B. L. (2020) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2020.61.11.909 · Cited by 152
Clarke, N., Pechey, E., Kosīte, D., König, L. M., Mantzari, E., Blackwell, A. K. M., Marteau, T. M., & Hollands, G. J. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1780147 · Cited by 116
Emotional processing in obesity: a systematic review and exploratory meta‐analysis
Fernandes, J., Ferreira‐Santos, F., Miller, K., & Torres, S. (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12607 · Cited by 126
Tseng, P., Chen, Y., Stubbs, B., Carvalho, A. F., Whiteley, P., Tang, C.-H., Yang, W., Chen, T., Li, D., Chu, C., et al. (2017) · Nutritional Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/1028415x.2017.1388598 · Cited by 111
Long-term noise exposure and the risk for type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis
Dzhambov, A. M. (2015) · Noise and Health · doi:10.4103/1463-1741.149571 · Cited by 105
Ultrasound‐guided core needle biopsy in salivary glands: A meta‐analysis
Kim, H. J., & Kim, J. S. (2017) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.26764 · Cited by 105
Chang, C.-H., Tseng, P.-T., Chen, N.-Y., Lin, P.-C., Lin, P.-Y., Chang, J. P. C., Kuo, F.-Y., Lin, J., Wu, M.-C., & Su, K.-P. (2018) · Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids · doi:10.1016/j.plefa.2018.01.001 · Cited by 103
Barrera, T. L., Mott, J. M., Hofstein, R. F., & Teng, E. J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.005 · Cited by 103
Introduction to systematic reviews and meta‐analysis
McKenzie, J. E., Beller, E. M., & Forbes, A. B. (2016) · Respirology · doi:10.1111/resp.12783 · Cited by 101
Kim, M., Kim, Y. H., Chun, J., Lee, H. S., Park, S. J., Cheon, J. H., Kim, T. I., Kim, W. H., & Park, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Crohn s and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa225 · Cited by 100
Parenting Interventions for ADHD: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Coates, J., Taylor, J. A., & Sayal, K. (2015) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054714535952 · Cited by 97
Assessing Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-analysis
Langan, D. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_4 · Cited by 99
Smaïl‐Faugeron, V., Chabouis, H. F., Courson, F., & Durieux, P. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-64 · Cited by 86
Chen, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Bao, J., Liu, C., Xia, Y., Huang, X., & Wang, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048681 · Cited by 85
Calculating statistical power for meta-analysis using metapower
Griffin, J. W. (2021) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.17.1.p024 · Cited by 84
Immediate implant placement with or without socket grafting: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Seyssens, L., Eeckhout, C., & Cosyn, J. (2022) · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · doi:10.1111/cid.13079 · Cited by 81
Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000294 · Cited by 81
Young, K. G., Duncanson, K., & Burrows, T. L. (2018) · Nutrition & Dietetics · doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12411 · Cited by 75
Bayesian estimation in random effects meta‐analysis using a non‐informative prior
Bodnar, O., Link, A., Arendacká, B., Possolo, A., & Elster, C. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7156 · Cited by 73
Exercise and bone mineral density in men: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Kelley, G. A., Kelley, K. S., & Kohrt, W. M. (2012) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.031 · Cited by 75
Fleming, P. S., Koletsi, D., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Pandis, N. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.012 · Cited by 73
Rodrigues-Krause, J. D. C., Farinha, J. B., Krause, M. D. S., & Reischak-Oliveira, Á. (2016) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.004 · Cited by 87
Testing Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-analysis in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity
Rubio‐Aparicio, M., López-López, J. A., Viechtbauer, W., Marín‐Martínez, F., Botella, J., & Sánchez‐Meca, J. (2019) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2018.1561404 · Cited by 74
Wang, C., & Lee, W. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1345 · Cited by 72
Carvalho, L. D. F., Sette, C. P., & Ferrari, B. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2018-3-5 · Cited by 78
Impact of Genetic Variability on Physiological Responses to Caffeine in Humans: A Systematic Review
Fulton, J. L., Dinas, P. C., Carrillo, A. E., Edsall, J. R., Ryan, E. J., & Ryan, E. J. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10101373 · Cited by 76
Goh, S. S. L., Lai, P. S. M., Tan, A. T. B., & Ponnampalavanar, S. S. L. (2017) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4305-8 · Cited by 69
Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Bellini, D., Rengo, M., Cecco, C. N. D., Iafrate, F., Hassan, C., & Laghi, A. (2014) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3190-1 · Cited by 69
Cheng, Y., Tseng, P., Chen, Y., Stubbs, B., Yang, W.-C., Chen, T., Wu, C.-K., & Lin, P. (2017) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s147305 · Cited by 75
Reynard, S., Dias, J., Mitić, M., Schrank, B., & Woodcock, K. A. (2022) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/31456 · Cited by 94
Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., & Fernandes, R. M. (2014) · Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal · doi:10.1002/ebch.1968 · Cited by 66
Kiciński, M. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004831 · Cited by 72
Can Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Be an Alternative to Classical Tonsillectomy? A Meta‐analysis
Kim, J. S., Kwon, S. H., Lee, E. J., & Yoon, Y. J. (2017) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599817700374 · Cited by 66
Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair‐wise meta‐analysis
Rhodes, K. M., Turner, R., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2015) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1193 · Cited by 65
Self-citationYang, Q., Lang, X., Li, W., & Liang, Y. (2022) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-021-00927-0 · Cited by 45
Kim, M., Kim, H. S., & Kim, Y. H. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10214797 · Cited by 59
Church, D., Stapleton, P., Yang, A., & Gallo, F. P. (2018) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000878 · Cited by 58
The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review
Frost, J., Walton, C. C., Purcell, R., Fisher, K., Gwyther, K., Kocherginsky, M., & Rice, S. M. (2024) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-023-00655-8 · Cited by 59
Exploring the Relationships Between Problem Gambling and ADHD: A Meta-Analysis
Theule, J., Hurl, K. E., Cheung, K., Ward, M. A., & Henrikson, B. (2016) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054715626512 · Cited by 63
Recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma following surgical approach: A meta‐analysis
Kim, J. S., & Kwon, S. H. (2016) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.26222 · Cited by 57
Rubio‐Aparicio, M., Sánchez‐Meca, J., López‐López, J. A., Botella, J., & Marín‐Martínez, F. (2017) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12092 · Cited by 56
A brief note on the random-effects meta-analysis model and its relationship to other models
McKenzie, J. E., & Veroniki, A. A. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111492 · Cited by 59
Alem, M. M. (2018) · Cardiovascular Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/1755-5922.12432 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Davey, J., Turner, R. M., Clarke, M. J., & Higgins, J. P.
- Affiliations
- MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Rebecca M
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2011-11-24
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 160-160
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3247075
- OpenAlex
- W1965385672
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Medical Research Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (U1052.00.011)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, sample size, health interventions
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Databases, Factual, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
