The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies
Open accessAbstract
Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. Our team was funded to complete a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of chronic musculoskeletal pain. It has been 25 years since Noblit and Hare published their core text on meta-ethnography, and the current health research environment brings additional challenges to researchers aiming to synthesise qualitative research. Noblit and Hare propose seven stages of meta-ethnography which take the researcher from formulating a research idea to expressing the findings. These stages are not discrete but form part of an iterative research process. We aimed to build on the methods of Noblit and Hare and explore the challenges of including a large number of qualitative studies into a qualitative systematic review. These challenges hinge upon epistemological and practical issues to be considered alongside expectations about what determines high quality research. This paper describes our method and explores these challenges. Central to our method was the process of collaborative interpretation of concepts and the decision to exclude original material where we could not decipher a concept. We use excerpts from our research team's reflexive statements to illustrate the development of our methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 · Cited by 3,569
What is Wrong with Social Theory?
Blumer, H. (1954) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088165 · Cited by 2,535
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt
Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-21 · Cited by 981
Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking
Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker-White, G., & Campbell, R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063 · Cited by 868
Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Morgan, M., Daker-White, G., Britten, N., Pill, R., Yardley, L., Pope, C., & Donovan, J. (2011) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta15430 · Cited by 619
Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge Into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature
Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120 · Cited by 511
Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Lloyd-Jones, M. (2012) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732312452937 · Cited by 248
A meta-ethnography of patients’ experience of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain
Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., Andrews, J., & Barker, K. (2013) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr01120 · Cited by 98 · cited 5×
“We aimed to explore the challenges of including a larger number of studies, and were funded by the NIHR to complete a meta-ethnography of patients’ experience of chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain [7].”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Butler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12134 · Cited by 539
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., Maxwell, M., Roberts, R. J., Turley, R. L., Booth, A., et al. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0 · Cited by 469
Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research?
Thomas, D. R. (2017) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435 · Cited by 487
Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry
Lachal, J., Revah-Levy, A., Orri, M., & Moro, M. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269 · Cited by 367
Moore, K., O'Shea, E., Kenny, L., Barton, J., Tedesco, S., Sica, M., Crowe, C., Alamäki, A., Condell, J., Nordström, A., et al. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/23832 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., & Barker, K.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2014-06-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-80
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133710899
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 11
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
- The paper
- Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., & Barker, K. (2014). Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
