The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry
Open accessAbstract
Background: Metasynthesis — the systematic review and integration of findings from qualitative studies — is an emerging technique in medical research that can use many different methods. Nevertheless, the method must be appropriate to the specific scientific field in which it is used. The objective is to describe the steps of a metasynthesis method adapted from Thematic Synthesis and phenomenology to fit the particularities of psychiatric research. Method: We detail each step of the method used in a metasynthesis published in 2015 on adolescent and young adults suicidal behaviors. We provide clarifications in several methodological points using the latest literature on metasyntheses. The method is described in six steps: define the research question and the inclusion criteria; select the studies; assess their quality; extract and present the formal data; analyze the data; and express the synthesis. Conclusions: Metasyntheses offer an appropriate balance between an objective framework, a rigorously scientific approach to data analysis and the necessary contribution of the researcher's subjectivity in the construction of the final work. They propose a third level of comprehension and interpretation that brings original insights, improve the global understanding in psychiatry and propose immediate therapeutic implications. They should be included in the psychiatric common research toolkit, to become better recognized by clinicians and mental health professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Tarsilla, M. (2010) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v6i14.284 · Cited by 5,178
Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods
(2008) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2008.1.6.47 · Cited by 4,351
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
(2020) · SAGE Research Methods Foundations · doi:10.4135/9781526421036813346 · Cited by 4,040
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 · Cited by 3,569
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985000 · Cited by 2,723
Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 · Cited by 2,042
Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x · Cited by 1,246
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt
Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-21 · Cited by 981
Cited by
Holopainen, R., Simpson, P., Piirainen, A., Karppinen, J., Schütze, R., Smith, A., O'Sullivan, P., & Kent, P. (2020) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809 · Cited by 180
“Since then, a number of qualitative syntheses have been published(10,50) because they are recognized as necessary tools to capture the increasing volume of qualitative research.(36,38,58) Qualitative metasynthesis brings together primary qualitative research findings and examines them with a new question.”
BackgroundNicholls, H., Nicholls, M., Tekin, S., Lamb, D., & Billings, J. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268890 · Cited by 147
Hazell, C. M., Chapman, L., Valeix, S. F., Roberts, P., Niven, J. E., & Berry, C. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1 · Cited by 138
Brede, J., Cage, E., Trott, J., Palmer, L., Smith, A., Serpell, L., Mandy, W., & Russell, A. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102131 · Cited by 139
Adolescent social media use and well-being: a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis
Shankleman, M., Hammond, L., & Jones, F. W. (2021) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-021-00154-5 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachal, J., Revah-Levy, A., Orri, M., & Moro, M. R.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 269-269
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2773405152
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269
- The paper
- Lachal, J., Revah-Levy, A., Orri, M., & Moro, M. R. (2017). Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.