Cited by 15Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

GPs’ role security and therapeutic commitment in managing alcohol problems: a randomised controlled trial of a tailored improvement programme

Open access
Keurhorst, Myrna, van Beurden, Ivonne, Anderson, Peter, Heinen, Maud, Akkermans, Reinier, Wensing, Michel, Laurant, Miranda·2014·BMC Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practitioners with more positive role security and therapeutic commitment towards patients with hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption are more involved and manage more alcohol-related problems than others. In this study we evaluated the effects of our tailored multi-faceted improvement implementation programme on GPs' role security and therapeutic commitment and, in addition, which professional related factors influenced the impact of the implementation programme. METHODS: In a cluster randomised controlled trial, 124 GPs from 82 Dutch general practices were randomised to either the intervention or control group. The tailored, multi-faceted programme included combined physician, organisation, and patient directed alcohol-specific implementation strategies to increase role security and therapeutic commitment in GPs. The control group was mailed the national guideline and patients received feedback letters. Questionnaires were completed before and 12 months after start of the programme. We performed linear multilevel regression analysis to evaluate effects of the implementation programme. RESULTS: Participating GPs were predominantly male (63%) and had received very low levels of alcohol related education before start of the study (0.4 h). The programme increased therapeutic commitment (p = 0.005; 95%-CI 0.13 - 0.73) but not role security (p = 0.58; 95%-CI -0.31 - 0.54). How important GPs thought it was to improve their care for problematic alcohol consumption, and the GPs' reported proportion of patients asked about alcohol consumption at baseline, contributed to the effect of the programme on therapeutic commitment. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored, multi-faceted programme aimed at improving GP management of patients with hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption improved GPs' therapeutic commitment towards patients with alcohol-related problems, but failed to improve GPs' role security. How important GPs thought it was to improve their care for problematic alcohol consumption, and the GPs' reported proportion of patients asked about alcohol consumption at baseline, both increased the impact of the programme on therapeutic commitment. It might be worthwhile to monitor proceeding of role security and therapeutic commitment throughout the year after the implementation programme, to see whether the programme is effective on short term but faded out on the longer term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00298220.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2296-15-70

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keurhorst, M., van Beurden, I., Anderson, P., Heinen, M., Akkermans, R., Wensing, M., & Laurant, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Keurhorst, Myrna
Venue
BMC Family Practice
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
70-70
ISSN
1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011266702
Cited by
15
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • ZonMw (63000003)
  • Trimbos-instituut
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
general practitioners, therapeutic commitment, alcohol-related problems, hazardous drinking, implementation program, alcohol screening, primary care, guideline implementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Netherlands, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Social Support, Program Evaluation, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Role, Directive Counseling, General Practitioners, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review