Cited by 204Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

INTERVENTION FOR EXCESSIVE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES OF ENGLISH GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Open access
Kaner, E. F. S.·1999·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

General practitioners' (GPs') recognition of, attitudes towards, and intervention for, excessive drinking and alcohol problems among their patients were assessed in a postal questionnaire survey. Levels of recognition of, and intervention for, excessive drinking by GPs were low. GPs did not routinely enquire about alcohol and had managed only small numbers of patients specifically for excessive drinking or alcohol problems in the previous year. Enquiry about alcohol issues was elicited mainly by physical symptoms or by new patient registrations. Although 83% of GPs felt prepared to counsel excessive drinkers, only 21% felt effective in helping patients reduce consumption. Over the past 10 years, there appears to have been an increase in numbers of GPs who feel that they should be working with alcohol issues, but fewer GPs perceive themselves as being effective in this work. The main barriers to brief alcohol intervention were given as insufficient time and training, and lack of help from government policy; the main incentives related to availability of appropriate support services and proven efficacy of brief interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/34.4.559

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaner, E. F. S.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kaner, E. F. S.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
559-566
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2130835336
Cited by
204
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • University of Sydney
  • University of Queensland
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
excessive alcohol consumption, alcohol problems, brief alcohol intervention, general practitioners, primary care, alcohol screening, physician attitudes, physician preparedness, barriers to intervention, alcohol counseling, England
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Attitude to Health, Education, Medical, United Kingdom, Health Promotion, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Preventive Health Services, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review