Cited by 33Antifungal resistance and susceptibilitySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Statins in candidemia: clinical outcomes from a matched cohort study.

Open access
Forrest, Graeme N, Kopack, Angela M, Perencevich, Eli N·2010·BMC Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with bacteremic sepsis have shown significant survival benefits in several studies. There is no data on the effect of statins in candidemic patients, however in-vitro models suggest that statins interfere with ergesterol formation in the wall of yeasts. METHODS: This retrospective matched- cohort study from 1/2003 to 12/2006 evaluated the effects of statins on patients with candidemia within intensive care units. Statin-users had candidemia as a cause of their systemic inflammatory response and were on statins throughout their antifungal therapy, while non-statin users were matched based on age +/- 5 years and co-morbid factors. Primary analysis was 30-day survival or discharge using bivariable comparisons. Multivariable comparisons were completed using conditional logistic regression. All variables with a p-value less than 0.10 in the bivariable comparisons were considered for inclusion in the conditional logistic model. RESULTS: There were 15 statin-users and 30 non-statin users that met inclusion criteria, all with similar demographics and co-morbid conditions except the statin group had more coronary artery disease (P < 0.01) and peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.03) and lower median APCAHE II scores (14.6 vs 17, p = 0.03). There were no differences in duration of candidemia, antifungal therapy or Candida species between the groups. Statins were associated with lower mortality on bivariable (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.11-0.75, p = 0.03) and multivariable (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.02-2.4, p = 0.21) analyses compared to controls; although, in the latter the protective effect lacked statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In our small, single-center matched-cohort study, statins may provide a survival benefit in candidemia, however further studies are warranted to validate and further explore this association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2334-10-152

Cites

30 of 31 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, and their antimicrobial activity is thought to stem from inhibition of isoprenoid biosynthesis, disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis, G-protein signaling, and Ras-dependent pathways.

    “Statins act as inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl‐CoA (HMG‐CoA) reductase, and their antimicrobial activity is thought to stem from the inhibition of isoprenoid biosynthesis, thereby disrupting key processes in fungal physiology, including ergosterol biosynthesis, modulation of G‐protein signaling, and activation of Ras‐dependent pathways [18, 19].”

    From Statins as Antifungal Agents: A Review on Drug Repurposing and Nanotechnology-Driven Delivery Strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Background identifies statins as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and says yeast produce ergosterol rather than cholesterol. The Discussion reports in-vitro evidence suggesting statins interfere with yeast ergosterol production. Neither section attributes their antimicrobial activity specifically to inhibition of isoprenoid biosynthesis or discusses G-protein signaling or Ras-dependent pathways. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pravastatin enhanced survival and led to a decreased fungal burden in C3H/HeN mice infected with C. albicans.

    “other work has demonstrated that pravastatin enhanced survival and led to a decreased fungal burden in C3H/HeN mice infected with C. albicans and the potential benefits of statins in the clinic against Candida have been described [10, 40-42].”

    From Assessment of the in vitro and in vivo activity of atorvastatin against Candida albicans. (2019) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Methods and Results describe a matched cohort of human ICU patients with candidemia, not infected mice. Searches for C3H/HeN mice, pravastatin, and fungal burden found no passage reporting the claimed mouse survival or fungal-burden results. The paper addresses the separate clinical-benefits clause in the citing sentence, but that does not verify the quoted mouse claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies have described potential benefits for statin use during Candida infection in mice and in a clinical setting.

    “Although some studies have described potential benefits for statin use during a Candida infection both in mice (Tashiro et al., 2012) and in a clinical setting (Forrest et al., 2010; Spanakis et al., 2010; Cuervo et al., 2013)”

    From Atorvastatin Reduces the Survival of Candida albicans-Infected BALB/c Mice (2015) · cites this paper as Forrest et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Westermeyer C Macreadie IG Simvastatin reduces ergosterol levels, inhibits growth and causes loss of mtDNA in Candida glabrata FEMS Yeast Res 2007 7 436 441 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00194.x 17257373 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forrest, G. N., Kopack, A. M., & Perencevich, E. N.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Forrest, Graeme N
Venue
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2010-06-04
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
152-152
ISSN
1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069028204
Cited by
33
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statins, candidemia, intensive care unit patients, antifungal therapy, ergosterol biosynthesis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Fungemia, Treatment Outcome, APACHE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review