Cited by 188Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Women’s experiences of factors that facilitate or inhibit gestational diabetes self-management

Open access
Carolan, Mary, Gill, Gurjeet K, Steele, Cheryl·2012·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes rates have increased dramatically in the past two decades and this pattern of increase appears to relate primarily to the obesity epidemic, older maternal age and migration from world areas of high GDM risk. Women from disadvantaged and migrant backgrounds are most at risk of developing and of mismanaging this condition. The aim of the study was to explore the factors that facilitated or inhibited gestational diabetes self-management among women in a socially deprived area. METHODS: Fifteen pregnant women, with a diagnosis of gestational diabetes, were purposively recruited for this study. Qualitative semi structured interviews and 1 focus group were conducted when participants were approximately 28-38 weeks gestation. The study's theoretical framework was based on interpretative phenomenology and data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Women in this study identified a number of factors that complicated their task of GDM self-management. Barriers included: (1) time pressures; (2) physical constraints; (3) social constraints; (4) limited comprehension of requirements, and (5) insulin as an easier option. Factors facilitating GDM self-management included: thinking about the baby and psychological support from partners and families. CONCLUSION: Women from low socio economic and migrant backgrounds often struggle to comprehend GDM self-management requirements. To improve adherence to management plans, these women require educational and supportive services that are culturally appropriate and aimed at a low level of literacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-12-99

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other factors such as hunger, time pressure, and food cravings often impede adherence to medical nutrition therapy.

    “Other factors such as hunger, time pressure, and food cravings often impede adherence to medical nutrition therapy [157].”

    From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [157]

    The Results section, “Barriers to GDM self-management” (page unavailable), identifies time pressure as a major difficulty with dietary self-management, and a participant says cravings made managing her diet hard. The passages do not identify hunger as a barrier among this study’s participants; the Discussion’s incomplete mention of others feeling hungry does not establish that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effecting behavioural change would require strategies that deliver culturally appropriate educational resources tailored to the specific needs and health literacy levels of diverse population groups.

    “Thus, effecting behavioural change would require strategies that deliver culturally appropriate educational resources tailored to the specific needs and health literacy levels of diverse population groups [157].”

    From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [157]

    The Conclusion says women from low-socioeconomic and migrant backgrounds need GDM support that is culturally appropriate and pitched at an appropriate health-literacy level. The Implications for practice also calls for targeted educational resources. The cited paper supports this approach for women managing gestational diabetes, but not the claim’s broader application to diverse population groups generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most women remain committed to ensuring their baby's well-being and are willing to adopt recommended dietary and glucose monitoring practices to ensure a healthy pregnancy.

    “Despite these challenges, most women remain committed to ensuring their baby’s well-being and are willing to adopt recommended dietary and glucose monitoring practices to ensure a healthy pregnancy [157].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Ferrara A Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a public health perspective Diabetes Care 2007 30 SUPPL. 2 S141 S146 17596462
  2. Metzger B The global increase in diabetes: unique issues for mothers and children International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 2006 26 2 57 62 10.4103/0973-3930.28274 · DOI
  3. Chu SY Callaghan WM Kim SY Schmid CH Lau J England LJ Dietz PM Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes Journal of Midwifery 2004 20 3 281 9 10.1016/j.midw.2004.01.002 17416786 · DOI
  4. Hunt KJ Schuller KL The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2007 34 2 173 99 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.03.002 PMC2043158 17572266 · DOI
  5. Gagnon AJ McDermott S Rigol-Chachamovich J Bandyopadhyay M Stray-Pedersen B Stewart D International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011 25 6 575 92 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01230.x 21980947 · DOI
  6. Carolan M Davey M-A Biro MA Kealy M Maternal age, ethnicity and gestational diabetes mellitus Midwifery 2011 10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.014 22000676 · DOI
  7. Coghill AE Hansen S Littman AJ Risk factors for eclampsia: a population-based study in Washington State, 1987–2007 Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 205 6 553.e1 553.e7 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.079 21855842 · DOI
  8. Langer O Yogev Y Xenakis E Brustman L Overweight and obese in gestational diabetes: the impact on pregnancy outcome Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 192 6 1768 1776 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.049 15970805 · DOI
  9. Bellamy L Casas JP Hingorani AD Williams D Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 2009 373 1773 1779 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5 19465232 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cheung NW Byth K Population health significance of gestational diabetes Diabetes Care 2003 26 7 2005 2009 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2005 12832303 · DOI
  11. Nolan CJ Controversies in gestational diabetes Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011 25 1 37 49 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.10.004 21115402 · DOI
  12. Mohsin M Bauman AE Jalaludin B The influence of antenatal and maternal factors on stillbirths and neonatal deaths in New South Wales, Australia J Biosoc Sci 2006 38 5 643 657 10.1017/S002193200502701X 16867210 · DOI
  13. Alwan N Tuffnell DJ West J Treatments for gestational diabetes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 8 3 CD003395 19588341 PMC7154381
  14. Phung H Bauman A Tran M Young L McDonald J Michell L Factors that influence special care nursery admissions to a district hospital in Southwestern Sydney J Paediatr Child Health 2005 41 3 119 124 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00560.x 15790322 · DOI
  15. Cheung NW Wasmer G Al-Ali J Risk factors for gestational diabetes among Asian women Diabetes Care 2001 24 5 955 956 10.2337/diacare.24.5.955 11347764 · DOI
  16. Link CL McKinlay JB Disparities in the prevalence of diabetes: is it race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status? Results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey Ethnicity and Disease 2009 19 3 288 292 19769011 PMC3706078
  17. Carolan M Steele C Margetts H Knowledge of gestational diabetes among a multi-ethnic cohort in Australia Midwifery 2010 26 6 579 588 10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.006 19261362 · DOI
  18. Carolan MC Steele C Margetts H Attitudes towards gestational diabetes among a multi-ethnic cohort in Australia J Clin Nurs 2010 19 17–18 2446 2453 20920072
  19. Hoffman L Nolan C Wilson JD Oats JJ Simmons D Gestational diabetes mellitus – management guidelines Med J Aust 1998 169 93 97 9700346
  20. Lemieux L Ryan EA The need for insulin in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance of pregnancy Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2004 28 3 196 200
  21. Langer O Maternal glycemic criteria for insulin therapy in gestational diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 1998 21 SUPPL.2 B91 B98 9704234
  22. Lee-Parritz A Contemporary management of gestational diabetes Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity 2011 18 6 395 400 21986513
  23. Dalfrà MG Lapolla A Masin M Giglia G Dalla Barba B Toniato R Antepartum and early postpartum predictors of type 2 diabetes development in women with gestational diabetes mellitus Diabetes and Metabolism 2001 27 6 675 680 11852376
  24. Chodick G Elchalal U Sella T Heymann AD Porath A Kokia E The risk of overt diabetes mellitus among women with gestational diabetes: a population-based study Diabet Med 2010 27 7 779 785 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02995.x 20636958 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lee AJ Hiscock RJ Wein P Walker SP Permezel M Gestational diabetes mellitus: clinical predictors and long-term risk of developing type 2 Diabetes - a retrospective cohort study using survival analysis Diabetes Care 2007 30 4 878 883 10.2337/dc06-1816 17392549 · DOI
  26. Kierkegaard S Fear and trembling 1985 New York Penguin: Translated by Hanney A
  27. Carolan M Women's experiences of gestational diabetes self-management: a qualitative study Midwifery 10.1016/j.midw. 2012.05.013 22877761 · DOI
  28. Ben Haroush A Yogev Y Chen R Hadar E Hod M Maternal obesity is the major risk factor for large-for-gestational -age infants in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 195 6 S159 18758799
  29. Hadar E Oats J Hod M Towards new diagnostic criteria for diagnosing GDM - The HAPO study J Perinat Med 2009 37 5 447 449 19725792
  30. Bradbury-Jones C Sambrook S Irvine F The phenomenological focus group: an oxymoron? J Adv Nurs 2009 65 3 663 671 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x 19222664 · DOI
  31. Webb C Kevern J Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research J Adv Nurs 2001 33 6 798 805 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x 11298218 · DOI
  32. Cote-Arsenault D Morrison-Beedy D Women’s voices reflecting changed expectations for pregnancy after perinatal loss J Nurs Scholarsh 2001 33 3 239 244 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00239.x 11552550 · DOI
  33. Jasper M The first year as a staff nurse: the experiences of a first cohort of Project 2000 nurses in a demonstration district J Adv Nurs 1996 24 779 790 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.25517.x 8894896 · DOI
  34. Van Kelst L Spitz B Seremeus W Thomson AM Student midwives’ views on maternity care just before their graduation J Adv Nurs 2012 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06042.x 22632134 · DOI
  35. Plank A Mazzoni V Cavada L Becoming a caregiver: new family carers' experience during the transition from hospital to home J Clin Nurs 2012 21 13 2072 2082 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04025.x 22672464 · DOI
  36. Rosenbek Minet LK Lønvig E-M Henriksen JE Wagner L The experience of living with diabetes following a self-management program based on motivational interviewing Qual Health Res 2011 doi: 10.1177/1049732311405066 21471428 · DOI
  37. Balas-Nakash M Rodríguez-Cano A Muñoz-Manrique C Vásquez-Peña P Perichart-Perera O Adherence to a medical nutrition therapy program in pregnant women with diabetes, measured by three methods, and its association with glycemic control Rev Investig Clin 2010 62 3 235 243 20815129
  38. Kapur K Kapur A Ramachandran S Mohan VE Aravind SR Badgandi M Srishyla MV Barriers to changing dietary behavior Journal of Association of Physicians of India 2008 56 27 32 18472496
  39. Schrauwers C Dekker G Maternal and perinatal outcome in obese pregnant patients Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2009 22 3 218 226 10.1080/14767050902801652 19330705 · DOI
  40. Rhoads-Baeza ME Reis J An exploratory mixed method assessment of low income, pregnant Hispanic women's understanding of gestational diabetes and dietary change Heal Educ J 2012 71 1 80 89 10.1177/0017896910386287 · DOI
  41. Bandyopadhyay M Small R Davey MA Oats JJN Forster DA Aylward A Lived experience of gestational diabetes mellitus among immigrant South Asian women in Australia Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011 51 4 360 364 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01322.x 21806582 · DOI
  42. Hoppichler F Lechleitner M Counseling programs and the outcome of gestational diabetes in Austrian and Mediterranean Turkish women Patient Educ Couns 2001 45 4 271 274 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00129-X 11755772 · DOI
  43. Alhusen JL Gross D Hayat MJ Woods AB Sharps PW The influence of maternal-fetal attachment and health practices on neonatal outcomes in low-income, urban women Res Nurs Heal 2012 35 112 120 10.1002/nur.21464 PMC3313492 22262085 · DOI
  44. Berg M Sparud-Lundin C Experiences of professional support during pregnancy and childbirth - A qualitative study of women with type 1 diabetes BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009 9 27 35 10.1186/1471-2393-9-27 19575789 PMC2725032 · DOI
  45. Levy-Shiff R Lerman M Har-Even D Hod M Maternal adjustment and Infant outcome in medically defined high-risk pregnancy Dev Psychol 2002 38 1 93 103 11806705
  46. Downs DS Ulbrecht JS Understanding exercise beliefs and behaviors in women with gestational diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 2006 29 2 236 240 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1262 16443866 · DOI
  47. Mendelson S McNeese-Smith D Koniak-Griffin D Nyamathi A Lu MC A community-based parish nurse intervention program for Mexican American women with gestational diabetes J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008 37 4 415 425 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00262.x 18754979 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carolan, M., Gill, G. K., & Steele, C.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Western Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Carolan, Mary
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
99-99
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974585907
Cited by
188
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • David and Elaine Potter Foundation
  • Ian Potter Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, self-management, barriers to self-management, migrant women, low socioeconomic status, maternal obesity, time pressure, insulin use, psychological support, culturally appropriate education, health literacy, pregnant women's experiences
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Diet Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Risk Factors, Self Care, Social Support, Time Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Diabetes, Gestational, Focus Groups, Vulnerable Populations, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review