Cited by 100Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Education

Effect of the Pregnant+ smartphone application in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomised controlled trial in Norway

Open access
Borgen, Iren, Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova, Jacobsen, Anne Flem, Garnweidner-Holme, Lisa Maria, Fayyad, Seraj, Noll, Josef, Lukasse, Mirjam·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of the Pregnant+ app on the 2-hour glucose level of the routine postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The Pregnant+ app was designed to provide information about GDM, and promote physical activity and a healthy diet. Design: A multicentre, non-blinded randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five diabetes outpatient clinics in the Oslo region. Participants: Women ≥18 years old with a 2-hour OGTT blood glucose level ≥9 mmol/L who owned a smartphone; understood Norwegian, Urdu or Somali; and were <33 weeks pregnant. A total of 238 women were randomised; 158 women completed the OGTT post partum. Intervention: The Pregnant+ app and usual care, the control group received usual care. Primary and secondary outcomes: The primary outcome was the 2-hour blood glucose level of the routine postpartum OGTT. Secondary outcomes reported were mode of delivery, induction of labour, Apgar score, birth weight, transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and breast feeding practice. Blood glucose levels during pregnancy, knowledge of diabetes, diet and physical activity are not reported. Results: No difference was found for the 2-hour blood glucose level of the postpartum OGTT, with 6.7 mmol/L (95% CI 6.2 to 7.1) in the intervention group and 6.0 mmol/L (95% CI 5.6 to 6.3) in the control group. The significant difference in the proportion of emergency caesarean sections between the intervention group, 10 (8.8%) and the usual care group, 27 (22.1%), disappeared when adjusted for parity. There were no differences in birth weight, breast feeding practice, obstetric complications or transfer to the intensive neonatal care unit. No adverse events were registered. Conclusion: The Pregnant+ app had no effect on 2-hour glucose level at routine postpartum OGTT. After controlling for parity, the difference in emergency caesarean section was not statistically significant. Trial registration number: NCT02588729 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030884

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borgen, I., Småstuen, M. C., Jacobsen, A. F., Garnweidner-Holme, L. M., Fayyad, S., Noll, J., & Lukasse, M.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Lukasse, Mirjam
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-11
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
e030884
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984303857
Cited by
100
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Norwegian Research Council (ID number: 228517)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, mobile application, emergency cesarean section, mode of delivery, parity, breastfeeding, neonatal intensive care admission, physical activity, diet
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diet Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Norway, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Biomarkers, Diabetes, Gestational, Treatment Outcome, Postpartum Period, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review