Cited by 83Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Open access
Ollerhead, Elizabeth, Osrin, David·2014·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The partograph is a graphic display of the progress of labour, recommended by the World Health Organization, but often underused in practice in low- and middle-income countries. We were interested in going beyond demonstration of potential efficacy - on which the existing literature concentrates - through a systematic review to identify barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Maternity and Infant Care, POPLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, from 1st January 1994 to 30th September 2013, using the term 'partogra*' to include 'partograph', 'partogram', or 'partogramme'. The selection criteria were for primary or secondary research describing barriers to and incentives for partograph use in low- and middle-income countries, in English, reported in peer-reviewed publications since 1994. Thematic analysis of text on partograph use was applied to a commonly used framework for change in clinical practice, with levels describing the innovation, the individual professional, the woman, and social, organisational, economic and political contexts. RESULTS: Reported barriers to and incentives for partograph use related to the partograph itself, professional skills and practice, clinical leadership and quality assurance, and the organisational environment within the wider provision of obstetric care. Neither the evidence base for its effectiveness, nor its credibility, was reported as a barrier to use. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing local barriers and incentives in low- and middle-income countries, based on those in published research, could inform strategies to improve partograph use. Emerging technologies could be used to address some barriers. The thresholds for essential maternity care at which the partograph adds value should be further evaluated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-14-281

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]Begum F Khan MAT The partograph in practice Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998 13 1 21 27
  2. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/281/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ollerhead, E., & Osrin, D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ollerhead, Elizabeth
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2014-08-16
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
281-281
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165324237
Cited by
83
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (091561/Z/10/Z, 091561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
partograph, obstetric practice, low- and middle-income countries, clinical leadership, quality assurance, organizational context, professional skills
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Decision Support Techniques, Developing Countries, Dystocia, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Leadership, Pregnancy, Organizational Culture, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review