Cited by 394Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisCellular Mechanics and Interactions

3D pancreatic carcinoma spheroids induce a matrix-rich, chemoresistant phenotype offering a better model for drug testing

Open access
Longati, Paola, Jia, Xiaohui, Eimer, Johannes, Wagman, Annika, Witt, Michael-Robin, Rehnmark, Stefan, Verbeke, Caroline, Toftgård, Rune +2 more·2013·BMC Cancer

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer related death. It is lethal in nearly all patients, due to an almost complete chemoresistance. Most if not all drugs that pass preclinical tests successfully, fail miserably in the patient. This raises the question whether traditional 2D cell culture is the correct tool for drug screening. The objective of this study is to develop a simple, high-throughput 3D model of human PDAC cell lines, and to explore mechanisms underlying the transition from 2D to 3D that might be responsible for chemoresistance. Methods: Several established human PDAC and a KPC mouse cell lines were tested, whereby Panc-1 was studied in more detail. 3D spheroid formation was facilitated with methylcellulose. Spheroids were studied morphologically, electron microscopically and by qRT-PCR for selected matrix genes, related factors and miRNA. Metabolic studies were performed, and a panel of novel drugs was tested against gemcitabine. Results: Comparing 3D to 2D cell culture, matrix proteins were significantly increased as were lumican, SNED1, DARP32, and miR-146a. Cell metabolism in 3D was shifted towards glycolysis. All drugs tested were less effective in 3D, except for allicin, MT100 and AX, which demonstrated effect. Conclusions: We developed a high-throughput 3D cell culture drug screening system for pancreatic cancer, which displays a strongly increased chemoresistance. Features associated to the 3D cell model are increased expression of matrix proteins and miRNA as well as stromal markers such as PPP1R1B and SNED1. This is supporting the concept of cell adhesion mediated drug resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2407-13-95

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ex vivo 3D models of tumor growth are being increasingly adopted, as a number of comparative studies between 3D spheroids and 2D monolayer cultures have shown that 3D culture more faithfully recapitulates in vivo biology.

    “Ex vivo 3D models of tumor growth are being increasingly adopted, as a number of comparative studies between 3D spheroids and 2D monolayer cultures have shown that 3D culture more faithfully recapitulates in vivo biology38–40.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longati, P., Jia, X., Eimer, J., Wagman, A., Witt, M.-R., Rehnmark, S., Verbeke, C., Toftgård, R., Löhr, M., & Heuchel, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Axcentua (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Löhr, Matthias
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
95-95
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057280155
Cited by
394
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancerfonden
  • Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases, Weizmann Institute of Science
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, multicellular spheroids, chemoresistance, gemcitabine, drug screening, extracellular matrix, miR-146a, DARPP-32, cell adhesion, glycolysis, stroma, PANC-1 cells, KPC mouse model, allicin
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Phenotype, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Spheroids, Cellular, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Lactic Acid, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review