CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 626Stress and Burnout ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internal construct validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ)

Open access
Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa, Jonsdottir, Ingibjörg H, Pallant, Julie, Ahlborg, Gunnar·2012·BMC Public Health
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1PMC PMC3307433
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a mental condition defined as a result of continuous and long-term stress exposure, particularly related to psychosocial factors at work. This paper seeks to examine the psychometric properties of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ) for validation of use in a clinical setting. METHODS: Data from both a clinical (319) and general population (319) samples of health care and social insurance workers were included in the study. Data were analysed using both classical and modern test theory approaches, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Of the 638 people recruited into the study 416 (65%) persons were working full or part time. Data from the SMBQ failed a CFA, and initially failed to satisfy Rasch model expectations. After the removal of 4 of the original items measuring tension, and accommodating local dependency in the data, model expectations were met. As such, the total score from the revised scale is a sufficient statistic for ascertaining burnout and an interval scale transformation is available. The scale as a whole was perfectly targeted to the joint sample. A cut point of 4.4 for severe burnout was chosen at the intersection of the distributions of the clinical and general population. CONCLUSION: A revised 18 item version of the SMBQ satisfies modern measurement standards. Using its cut point it offers the opportunity to identify potential clinical cases of burnout.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Distribution of General Population of Health Care Workers (white) and Clinical (Black) subjects and items on the same metric.
Figure 1 Distribution of General Population of Health Care Workers (white) and Clinical (Black) subjects and items on the same metric.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Equating of scores for the 22 item SMBQ version (1) with the 18 item SMBQ version (2).
Figure 2 Equating of scores for the 22 item SMBQ version (1) with the 18 item SMBQ version (2).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. National Board of Health and Welfare: Exhaustion disorder. (Swedish: Utmattningssyndrom-stressrelaterad psykisk ohälsa) Stockholm. 2003
  2. Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G: RUMM 2030. 2010, Perth: RUMM Laboratory
  3. Muthen LK, Muthen BO: Mplus User's Guide. 2010, Los Angeles CA: Muthen & Muthen, Sixth

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–626 of 626

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Pallant, J., & Ahlborg, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
ORCID
Pallant, Julie
Venue
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-01-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-2458-12-1
PMC
PMC3307433
OpenAlex
W2148425918
Cited by
626
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
32.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, psychometric validation, Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, scale revision, healthcare workers, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review