Cited by 56Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMedication Adherence and ComplianceBehavioral Health and Interventions

Adherence to the oral contraceptive pill: a cross-sectional survey of modifiable behavioural determinants

Open access
Molloy, Gerard J, Graham, Heather, McGuinness, Hannah·2012·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is reported as one of the main causes of unintended pregnancy in women that rely on this form of contraception. This study aims to estimate the associations between a range of well-established modifiable psychological factors and adherence to OCP. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey of 130 female University students currently using OCP (Mean age: 20.46 SD: 3.01, range 17-36) was conducted. An OCP specific Medication Adherence Report Scale was used to assess non-adherence. Psychological predictor measures included necessity and concern beliefs about OCP, intentions, perceived behavioural control (pbc), anticipated regret and action and coping planning. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Fifty-two per cent of participants reported missing their OCP once or more per month and 14% twice or more per month. In bivariate analysis intentions (r = -0.25), perceived behavioural control (r= -0.66), anticipated regret (r=0.20), concerns about OCP (r =0.31), and action (r= -0.25) and coping (r= -0.28) planning were all significantly associated with adherence to OCP in the predicted direction. In a multivariate model almost half (48%) of the variation in OCP adherence could be explained. The strongest and only statistically significant predictors in this model were perceived behavioural control (β=-0.62, p<0.01) and coping planning (β =-0.23, p=0.03). A significant interaction between intentions and anticipated regret was also observed. CONCLUSION: The present data point to a number of key modifiable psychological determinants of OCP use. Future work will establish whether changing these variables results in better adherence to the OCP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-12-838

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molloy, G. J., Graham, H., & McGuinness, H.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Molloy, Gerard J
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2012-10-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
838-838
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999232522
Cited by
56
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
oral contraceptives, medication adherence, psychological factors, perceived behavioral control, coping planning, anticipated regret, intention, university students, unintended pregnancy, non-compliance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Regression Analysis, Health Behavior, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Medication Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review