The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The increase in childhood obesity is a serious public health concern. Several studies have indicated that breastfed children have a lower risk of childhood obesity than those who were not breastfed, while other studies have provided conflicting evidence. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between breastfeeding and the risk of childhood obesity. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL Plus with Full Text databases were systematically searched from start date to 1st August 2014. Based on the meta-analysis, pooled adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. I2 statistic was used to evaluate the between-study heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Fail-safe N were used to assess publication bias and reliability of results, and results from both Egger test and Begg test were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a total of 226,508 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The studies' publication dates ranged from 1997 to 2014, and they examined the population of 12 countries. Results showed that breastfeeding was associated with a significantly reduced risk of obesity in children (AOR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.81). Categorical analysis of 17 studies revealed a dose-response effect between breastfeeding duration and reduced risk of childhood obesity. CONCLUSION: Results of our meta-analysis suggest that breastfeeding is a significant protective factor against obesity in children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis
Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.698 · Cited by 1,286
Weng, S. F., Redsell, S. A., Swift, J. A., Yang, M., & Glazebrook, C. P. (2012) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-302263 · Cited by 592
Breastfeeding as obesity prevention in the United States: A sibling difference model
Metzger, M. W., & McDade, T. W. (2010) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.20982 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Obesity in children and adolescents: epidemiology, causes, assessment, and management
Jebeile, H., Kelly, A. S., O'Malley, G., & Baur, L. A. (2022) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00047-x · Cited by 1,099
Peters, U., Dixon, A. E., & Forno, E. (2018) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.004 · Cited by 934
You Are What You Eat—The Relationship between Diet, Microbiota, and Metabolic Disorders—A Review
Moszak, M., Szulińska, M., & Bogdański, P. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12041096 · Cited by 397
Feig, D. S., Berger, H., Donovan, L., Godbout, A., Kader, T., Keely, E., & Sanghera, R. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.038 · Cited by 344
Rethinking healthy eating in light of the gut microbiome
Armet, A. M., Deehan, E. C., O’Sullivan, A. F., Mota, J. F., Field, C. J., Prado, C. M., Lucey, A. J., & Walter, J. (2022) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.016 · Cited by 252
Ahmed, A. H., Roumani, A. M., Szucs, K., Zhang, L., & King, D. (2016) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2015.12.001 · Cited by 86
Special Report: The Biology of Inequalities in Health: The Lifepath Consortium
Vineis, P., Avendano-Pabon, M., Barros, H., Bartley, M., Carmeli, C., Carra, L., Chadeau-Hyam, M., Costa, G., Delpierre, C., D'Errico, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00118 · Cited by 80
Paun, A., & Danska, J. S. (2016) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12424 · Cited by 67
Risk Factors, Clinical Consequences, Prevention, and Treatment of Childhood Obesity
Shaban Mohamed, M. A., AbouKhatwa, M. M., Saifullah, A. A., Hareez Syahmi, M., Mosaad, M., Elrggal, M. E., Dehele, I. S., & Elnaem, M. H. (2022) · Children · doi:10.3390/children9121975 · Cited by 52
Ioannou, A., Knol, J., & Belzer, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.631282 · Cited by 44
Zheng, M., D’Souza, N. J., Atkins, L., Ghobadi, S., Laws, R., Szymlek-Gay, E. A., Grimes, C., Baker, P., He, Q.-Q., & Campbell, K. J. (2024) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100152 · Cited by 44
Pathirana, M. M., Ali, A., Lassi, Z. S., Arstall, M. A., Roberts, C. T., & Andraweera, P. H. (2022) · Journal of Human Lactation · doi:10.1177/08903344211034779 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, J., Liu, L., Zhu, Y., Huang, G., & Wang, P. P.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1267-1267
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050417124
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
