Cited by 154Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients at Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. A five - year retrospective study

Open access
Tessema, Belay, Muche, Abebe, Bekele, Assegedech, Reissig, Dieter, Emmrich, Frank, Sack, Ulrich·2009·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Gondar University Teaching Hospital standardized tuberculosis prevention and control programme, incorporating Directly Observed Treatment, Short Course (DOTS) started in 2000. According to the proposal of World Health Organization (WHO), treatment outcome is an important indicator of tuberculosis control programs. This study investigated the outcome of tuberculosis treatment at Gondar University Teaching Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: We analyzed the records of 4000 tuberculosis patients registered at Gondar University Teaching Hospital from September 2003 to May 2008. Treatment outcome and tuberculosis type were categorized according to the national tuberculosis control program guideline. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression model was used to analyse the association between treatment outcome and potential predictor variables. RESULTS: From the total of 4000 patients, tuberculosis type was categorized as extrapulmonary in 1133 (28.3%), smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis in 2196 (54.9%) and smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis in 671 (16.8%) cases. Of all patients, treatment outcome was classified as successfully treated in 1181(29.5%), defaulted in 730 (18.3%), died in 403 (10.1%), treatment failed in six (0.2%) and transferred out in 1680 (42.0%) patients. Males had the trend to be more likely to experience death or default than females, and the elderly were more likely to die than younger. The proportion of default rate was increased across the years from 97(9.2%) to 228(42.9%). Being female, age group 15-24 years, smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis and being urban resident were associated with higher treatment success rate. CONCLUSION: The treatment success rate of tuberculosis patients was unsatisfactorily low (29.5%). A high proportion of patients died (10.1%) or defaulted (18.3%), which is a serious public health concern that needs to be addressed urgently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-9-371

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Frieden TR Sterling TR Munsiff SS Watt CJ Dye C Tuberculosis Lancet 2003 362 887 899 13678977 10.1097/00002030-200101260-00002 · DOI
  2. Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (MOH) Tuberculosis, Leprosy and TB/HIV Prevention and Control Programme Manual Addis Ababa: MOH 2008 4 10.1001/jama.279.12.943 · DOI
  3. World Health Organization Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines for National Programmes Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/CDS/TB/2003 2003 313 1 108 10.1056/NEJM199404283301702 · DOI
  4. Seetha MA Srikantaramu N Aneja KS Hardan Singh Influence of motivation of patients and their family members on the drug collection by patients Indian J Tuberc 1981 28 182 190 10.1016/0962-8479(93)90010-U · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tessema, B., Muche, A., Bekele, A., Reissig, D., Emmrich, F., & Sack, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Gondar (ET)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology (DE)
Corresponding author
Tessema, Belay
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2009-10-04
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
371-371
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059980350
Cited by
154
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
tuberculosis, treatment outcomes, DOTS, treatment default, tuberculosis mortality, smear-negative tuberculosis, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, sex differences, age differences, urban residence, predictors of treatment success
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antitubercular Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Ethiopia, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Tuberculosis, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review