Cited by 55Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea among privately paying patients- a cross sectional study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the compliance, benefits and side effects associated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy among Pakistani patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in private sector. METHODS: Patients diagnosed to have OSA based on overnight study who were recommended for CPAP therapy, between 1998 and 2003, were evaluated by telephonic survey and review of hospital notes. Compliance, benefits and side effects associated with CPAP therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 135 patients who were prescribed CPAP therapy, 75 could be contacted. Sixty (80%) started using CPAP within one month of diagnosis and 46 (61%) continued to use it long-term (beyond one year). Compliance with CPAP therapy was associated with higher body mass index, higher Epworth sleepiness scale score, history of witnessed apnea, and reduction in daytime sleepiness with CPAP therapy. OSA severity as assessed by apnea-hypopnea index did not affect compliance with CPAP therapy. Use of anti-depressants and CPAP induced sleep disturbances were associated with poor compliance with CPAP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, excessive daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea and improvement of daytime symptoms following use of CPAP were predictors of improved compliance. Use of antidepressants and CPAP induced sleep disturbances were predictors of poor compliance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2466-14-188

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPAP adherence shows a significant reduction in long-term follow-up, estimated at around 50% until the end of the first year.

    “its adherence shows a significant reduction in long-term follow-up, being estimated at around 50% until the end of the first year, according to several studies.”

    From Role of Nasal Surgery in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results report that 80% started CPAP within one month and 61.3% continued beyond one year, supporting lower long-term use. They do not establish a statistically significant decline or an adherence estimate of around 50% at the end of the first year. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hussain, S. F., Irfan, M., Waheed, Z., Alam, N., Mansoor, S., & Islam, M.
Affiliations
  • Kettering General Hospital (GB)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region (SA)
  • Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
Corresponding author
Irfan, Muhammad
Venue
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2014-11-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
188-188
ISSN
1471-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083585752
Cited by
55
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pulmonary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP therapy, medication adherence, predictors of compliance, body mass index, daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea, antidepressants, CPAP side effects, sleep disorders, apnea-hypopnea index, Pakistani patients, private sector
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Middle Aged, Pakistan, Patient Compliance, Severity of Illness Index, Body Mass Index, Hospitals, Private, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review