Cited by 453Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersDiabetes Management and Research

Type 2 Diabetes, Glycemic Control, and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Babu, Ambika R., Herdegen, James, Fogelfeld, Leon, Shott, Susan, Mazzone, Theodore·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a prevalent condition associated with significant comorbidities, including hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and insulin resistance. It has been previously shown that the severity of insulin resistance is related to the severity of SDB. METHODS: Using a 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring system, we studied changes in interstitial glucose levels and measured hemoglobin A1c levels in 25 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus before and after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for SDB. RESULTS: With a mean +/- SD CPAP treatment period of 83 +/- 50 days, the mean +/- SD 1-hour postprandial glucose values were significantly reduced for breakfast (191 +/- 68 mg/dL to 130 +/- 41 mg/dL [10.6 +/- 3.8 mmol/L to 7.2 +/- 2.3 mmol/L]), lunch (196 +/- 70 mg/dL to 138 +/- 49 mg/dL [10.9 +/- 3.9 mmol/L to 7.7 +/- 2.7 mmol/L]), and dinner (199 +/- 66 mg/dL to 137 +/- 48 mg/dL [11.0 +/- 3.7 mmol/L to 7.6 +/- 2.7 mmol/L]). In the 17 patients with a baseline hemoglobin A1c level greater than 7%, there was a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c level (9.2% +/- 2.0% to 8.6% +/- 1.8%). Furthermore, in subjects who used CPAP for more than 4 h/d, the reduction in hemoglobin A1c level was significantly correlated with days of CPAP use. There was no such correlation in subjects who used CPAP for 4 h/d or less. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that SDB is pathophysiologically related to impaired glucose homeostasis, and that CPAP can be an important therapeutic approach for diabetic patients with SDB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.4.447

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babu, A. R., Herdegen, J., Fogelfeld, L., Shott, S., & Mazzone, T.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-02-28
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
447
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103628919
Cited by
453
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 37
FWCI
21.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep-disordered breathing, continuous positive airway pressure, glycemic control, HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, insulin resistance, glucose homeostasis
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Circadian Rhythm, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Glycemic Index, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review