Cited by 21Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchPediatric health and respiratory diseases

Protocol for Northern Ireland Caries Prevention in Practice Trial (NIC-PIP) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the effects and costs of a dental caries prevention regime for young children attending primary care dental services

Open access
Tickle, Martin, Milsom, Keith M, Donaldson, Michael, Killough, Seamus, O'Neill, Ciaran, Crealey, Grainne, Sutton, Matthew, Noble, Solveig +2 more·2011·BMC Oral Health

Abstract

Background: Dental caries is a persistent public health problem with little change in the prevalence in young children over the last 20 years. Once a child contracts the disease it has a significant impact on their quality of life. There is good evidence from Cochrane reviews including trials that fluoride varnish and regular use of fluoride toothpaste can prevent caries. The Northern Ireland Caries Prevention in Practice Trial (NIC-PIP) trial will compare the costs and effects of a caries preventive package (fluoride varnish, toothpaste, toothbrush and standardised dental health education) with dental health education alone in young children. Methods/Design: A randomised controlled trial on children initially aged 2 and 3 years old who are regular attenders at the primary dental care services in Northern Ireland. Children will be recruited and randomised in dental practices. Children will be randomised to the prevention package of both fluoride varnish (twice per year for three years), fluoride toothpaste (1,450 ppm F) (supplied twice per year), a toothbrush (supplied twice a year) or not; both test and control groups receive standardised dental health education delivered by the dentist twice per year. Randomisation will be conducted by the Belfast Trust Clinical Research Support Centre ([CRSC] a Clinical Trials Unit). 1200 participants will be recruited from approximately 40 dental practices. Children will be examined for caries by independent dental examiners at baseline and will be excluded if they have caries. The independent dental examiners will examine the children again at 3 years blinded to study group. The primary end-point is whether the child develops caries (cavitation into dentine) or not over the three years. One secondary outcome is the number of carious surfaces in the primary dentition in children who experience caries. Other secondary outcomes are episodes of pain, extraction of primary teeth, other adverse events and costs which will be obtained from parental questionnaires. Discussion: This is a pragmatic trial conducted in general dental practice. It tests a composite caries prevention intervention, which represents an evidence based approach advocated by current guidance from the English Department of Health which is feasible to deliver to all low risk (caries free) children in general dental practice. The trial will provide valuable information to policy makers and clinicians on the costs and effects of caries prevention delivered to young children in general dental practice. Trial registration: EudraCT No: 2009 - 010725 - 39 ISRCTN: ISRCTN36180119 Ethics Reference No: 09/H1008/93:

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6831-11-27

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Department of Health Darzi L High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review final report 2008 London: DoH
  2. Department of Health NHS Next Stage Review: Our vision for primary and community care 2008 Gateway

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tickle, M., Milsom, K. M., Donaldson, M., Killough, S., O'Neill, C., Crealey, G., Sutton, M., Noble, S., Greer, M., & Worthington, H. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Health and Social Care Board (GB)
  • British Dental Association (GB)
  • Royal Victoria Hospital (GB)
  • Northern Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Worthington, Helen V
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2011-10-10
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989906539
Cited by
20
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/14/19, HTA/08/14/19)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (08/14/19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Keywords
dental caries prevention, young children, fluoride varnish, fluoride toothpaste, toothbrushes, oral health education, primary dental care, caries incidence, primary teeth, cost-effectiveness, primary tooth extraction, low-risk children
MeSH terms
Cariostatic Agents, Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Topical, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Dental, Humans, Northern Ireland, Preventive Dentistry, Primary Health Care, Toothbrushing, Toothpastes, Treatment Outcome, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review