Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital, south Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Desalegn, Anteneh Assefa·2013·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To promote rational drug use in developing countries, it is important to assess drug use pattern using the World Health Organization (WHO) drug use indicators. The aim of this study was to assess the drug prescription patterns at the Medical Outpatient Pharmacy of Hawassa University Teaching and Referral Hospital, using some of the WHO core drug use indicators. METHODS: A descriptive, quantitative, and cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the current prescribing practices at Hawassa University Teaching and Referral Hospital. The sample was selected using systematic random sampling. 1290 patient encounters were reviewed retrospectively for a 2-year period from September 2007 to September 2009. Data were collected from prescriptions and Prescription registration books retained in the pharmacy. RESULT: The average number of drugs prescribed per encounter or mean was 1.9 (SD 0.91) with a range between 1 and 4. The percentage of encounters in which an antibiotic or injection was prescribed was 58.1% (n = 749) and 38.1% (n = 491), respectively. The Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name and from an essential drug list was 98.7% (n=2419) and 96.6% (n=2367), respectively. The most commonly prescribed forms of antibiotics were amoxicillin (16.4%), ampicillin (15%), gentamicin (14.9%) and chloramphenicol (11.6%). On the other hand, the most commonly prescribed injections were ampicillin (21.4%), cloxacillin (13.4%), crystalline penicillin (12.4%), ceftriaxon (9.8%) gentamicin (9.8%), diclofenac (9.4%), chloramphenicol 41 (8.4%) and furosemide 25 (5.1%). CONCLUSION: On the basis of the finding of this study, the prescribing practices for antibiotic and injection shows deviation from the standard recommended by WHO. These two commonly overused and costly forms of drug therapy need to be regulated closely. Drug use evaluation should be done for some of the antibiotics to check whether they were appropriately prescribed or not. On the other hand, polypharmacy, generic prescribing and prescribing from EDL were not found to be a problem in this study. Teaching hospitals have a special responsibility to society to promote rational prescribing by their staff and, through them, the future generations of doctors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-13-170

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. WHO: The Rational Use of Drugs. Report of a conference of experts, Nairobi, 25–29 November 1985. 1987, Geneva: World Health Organization
  2. WHO: WHO Medicines Strategy: Framework for action Essential drugs and Medicines policy. 2000, Geneva: WHO;2000.(WHO/EDM/2000.1), –2003
  3. Hogerzeil HV, Walker GJA, Sallami AO, Fernando G: Impact of an essential drugs program on availability and rational use of drugs. Lancet. 1989, 1 (8630): 141-142. · DOI
  4. WHO: World Health Organization promoting rational use of medicines: core components. WHO Policy and Perspectives on medicine no. 5 Document WHO/EDM/2002.3. 2002, Geneva: WHO
  5. Debalto D, Gobe Z, Teklemariam S: A base line survey of prescribing indicators and factors influencing prescribing in southern Ethipia. J Health Dev. 1991, 11 (3): 263-267.
  6. Abdulahi M, Shiferaw T: Pattern of prescription in Jimma Hosptial. Ethiop J Health Dev. 1997, 11 (3): 263-267.
  7. WHO: How to investigate drug use in health facilities: selected drug use indicators. 1993, Geneva: WHO/DAP/93.1
  8. Laing RO, Hogerzeil HV: Ten recommendations to improve use of medicines in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2001, 16 (1): 13-20. 10.1093/heapol/16.1.13. Oxford University Press · DOI
  9. Desta Z, Abula T, Gebre-Yohannes A, Worku A: Drug prescribing pattens for outpatients in three hospitals in north-west Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2002, 16 (2): 183-189. · DOI
  10. Bimo: Report on Nigerian field test. INRUD News 1992; 3(1): 9–10. How to investigate drug use in health facilities. 1993, Geneva: WHO, 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)
  11. Bannenberg WJ, Forshaw CJ, Fresle D, Salami AO, Wahab HA: Evaluation of the Nile province essential drug project. 1991, WHO: Geneva, WHO/DAP/91.10. In: How to investigate drug use in health facilities. Geneva, WHO, 1993: 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)
  12. Ministry of Health/Zimbabwe Essential Drugs Action Programme: Essential Drugs Survey. How to investigate drug use in health facilities. 1993, WHO: Geneva, 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)
  13. Ofori-Adjei D: Report on Tanzanian field test. INRUD News; 3(1): 9. How to investigate drug use in health facilities. 1993, WHO: Geneva, 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)
  14. Christensen RF: A strategy for the improvement of prescribing and drug use in rural health facilities in Uganda. Ugandan Essential drugs and management program; 2 September-11 October 1990. How to investigate drug use in health facilities. 1993, Geneva: WHO, 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)
  15. Bimo: Field testing of drug use indicators of INRUD: report of field trip to Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Nepal, June-July 1991. How to investigate drug use in health facilities. 1993, WHO: Geneva, 74(WHO/DAP/93.1)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Desalegn, A. A.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
170-170
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082695165
Cited by
332
References
1
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.