Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of Swedish snus for smoking reduction and cessation
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological studies suggest that smokeless tobacco in the form of Swedish snus has been used by many smokers in Scandinavia to quit smoking, but the efficacy of snus has so far not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy of snus to help adult cigarette smokers in Serbia to substantially reduce, and, eventually, completely stop smoking. The study enrolled 319 healthy smokers aged 20-65 years at two occupational health centers in Belgrade, Serbia. Most of them (81%) expressed an interest to quit rather than just reduce their smoking. Study products were used ad libitum throughout the 48-week study period. The main study objective during the first 24 weeks was smoking reduction. The primary end-point was defined as a biologically verified reduction of ≥ 50% in the average number of smoked cigarettes per day during week 21-24 compared to baseline. During week 25-48 participants were actively instructed to stop smoking completely. Outcome measures of biologically verified, complete smoking cessation included 1-week point prevalence rates at clinical visits after 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks, as well as 4-, 12- and 24-week continued cessation rates at the week 36 and 48 visits. Results: At the week 24 visit, the proportion of participants who achieved the protocol definition of a ≥ 50% smoking reduction was similar in the two treatment groups. However, the proportion that reported more extreme reductions (≥ 75%) was statistically significantly higher in the snus group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). The results for biologically verified complete cessation suggested that participants in the snus group were more likely to quit smoking completely than the controls; the odds ratio (snus versus placebo) for the protocol estimates of cessation varied between 1.9 to 3.4, but these ratios were of borderline significance with p-values ranging from 0.04-0.10. Snus was well tolerated and only 2/158 (1.3%) participants in the snus group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (in both cases unrelated to snus). Conclusions: Swedish snus could promote smoking cessation among smokers in Serbia, that is, in a cultural setting without traditional use of oral, smokeless tobacco. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00601042
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among participants using snus for 24 weeks, there is a higher reduction in average number of smoked cigarettes per day (≥ 75%) (9.5%; p < 0.01) compared to the placebo group (2.5%).
“Higher reduction in average number of smoked cigarettes per day (≥ 75%) among participants who used snus for 24 weeks (9.5%; p < 0.01) compared to placebo group (2.5% for 24 weeks)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Joksić et al. 2011
Among snus users for 36 weeks, there are increased odds of smoking cessation (1 week point-prevalence) (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.0-7.3; p = 0.04) compared to placebo.
“Increased odds of smoking cessation (1 week point-prevalence cessation) for 36 weeks among snus users (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.0-7.3;p = 0.04) compared to placebo (Joksić et al. 2011).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Joksić et al. 2011
Among participants using snus for 12 weeks, 19.6% achieved a ≥ 50% smoking reduction compared to 12.4% in the placebo group (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 0.94-3.23; p = 0.08).
“19.6% participants who use snus for 12 weeks achieved a ≥ 50% smoking reduction (OR = 1.7; 95% C.I.: 0.94-3.23;p = 0.08) compared to 12.4% participants in the placebo group (Joksić et al. 2011).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Joksić et al. 2011
Among participants using snus for 24 weeks, 63.9% achieved a ≥ 50% smoking reduction compared to 67.7% in the placebo group (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.48-1.36; p = 0.42).
“63.9% participants who use snus for 24 weeks achieved a ≥ 50% smoking reduction (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.48-1.36;p = 0.42) compared to 67.7% participants in the placebo group”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Joksić et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Moore, D., Aveyard, P., Connock, M., Wang, D., Fry-Smith, A., & Barton, P. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1024 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Foulds J Ramström L Burke M Fagerström K The effects of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden Tobacco Control 2003 12 349 359 10.1136/tc.12.4.349 14660766 PMC1747791 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee PN Hamling J Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer in Europe and North America BMC Med 2009 29 36 PMC2744672 19638245
- Lee PN Summary of the epidemiological evidence relating snus to health Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2011 59 197 214 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.12.002 21163315 · DOI
- Rodu B Cole P Lung cancer mortality: comparing Sweden with other countries in the European Union Scand J Public Health 2010 38 332 3 10.1177/1403494810364203 19535408 · DOI
- Lund K Scheffels J McNeill A The association between use of snus and quit rates for smoking: results from seven Norwegian cross-sectional studies Addiction 2011 106 162 167 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03122.x 20883459 PMC3021722 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramström L Commentary on Lund Consolidating the evidence on effectiveness of snus for smoking cessation - implications for public health Addiction 2011 106 168 169 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03180.x 21618730 · DOI
- World Health Organization WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. Report on the scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: third report of a WHO study group 2009 WHO Technical Report Series 955, Geneva, Switzerland 20942227
- Asfar T Ebbert JO Klesges RC Relyea GE Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit? Addict Behav 2011 36 764 768 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.003 21420791 PMC3081955 · DOI
- International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use ICH-GCP Good Clinical Practice http://ichgcp.net Retrieved July 2011 PMC1364893 8054244
- Rutqvist LE Curvall M Hassler T Ringberger T Wahlberg I Swedish snus and the GothiaTek® standard Harm Reduction Journal 2011 8 11 10.1186/1477-7517-8-11 21575206 PMC3119032 · DOI
- Lunell E Lunell M Steady-state nicotine plasma levels following use of four different types of Swedish snus compared with 2-mg Nicorette chewing gum: a crossover study Nicotine Tob Res 2005 7 397 403 10.1080/14622200500125468 16085507 · DOI · Paper page
- Benowitz NL Porchet H Sheiner L Jacob P III Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988 44 23 28 10.1038/clpt.1988.107 3391001 · DOI · Paper page
- Heatherton TF Kozlowski LT Frecker RC Fagerström KO The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire Br J Addict 1991 86 1119 1127 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x 1932883 · DOI · Paper page
- Simmons MS Connett JE Nides MA Lindgren PG Kleerup EC Murray RP Bjornson WM Tashkin DP Smoking reduction and the rate of decline in FEV1: results from the Lung Health Study Eur Respir J 2005 25 1011 7 10.1183/09031936.05.00086804 15929955 · DOI
- Tönnesen P Mikkelsen K Bremann L Nurse-conducted smoking cessation in patients with COPD using nicotine sublingual tablets and behavioral support Nicotine Tob Res 2005 7 139 48 10.1080/14622200412331328411 16899830 · DOI
- Gilljam H Galanti MR Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden Addiction 2003 98 1183 9 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00379.x 12930201 · DOI
- Hajek P Jackson P Belcher M Long-term Use of Nicotine Chewing Gum: Occurrence, Determinants, and Effect on Weight Gain JAMA 1988 260 1593 1596 10.1001/jama.260.11.1593 3411739 · DOI
- Jarvis MJ Raw M Russell MAH Feyerabend C Randomised controlled trial of nicotine chewing-gum BMJ 1982 285 537 540 10.1136/bmj.285.6341.537 6809161 PMC1499070 · DOI
- Murray RP Bailey WC Daniels K Bjornson WM Kurnow K Connett JE Nides MA Kiley JP Safety of Nicotine Polacrilex Gum Used by 3,094 Participants in the Lung Health Study Chest 1996 109 438 445 10.1378/chest.109.2.438 8620719 · DOI
- Lund K-E McNeill A Scheffels J The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products Nicotine Tob Res 2010 12 817 822 10.1093/ntr/ntq105 20622023 PMC2910876 · DOI
- Ramström LM Foulds J Role of snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden Tobacco Control 2006 15 210 214 10.1136/tc.2005.014969 16728752 PMC2564662 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation
Lindson, N., Klemperer, E., Hong, B., Ordóñez-Mena, J. M., & Aveyard, P. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013183.pub2 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Joksić, G., Spasojević-Tišma, V., Antić, R., Nilsson, R., & Rutqvist, L. E.
- Venue
- Harm Reduction Journal
- Published
- 2011-09-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1477-7517
- PMC
- PMC3186733
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review