The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the nature of evolutionary relationships among persons and populations is important for the efficient application of genome science to biomedical research. We have analysed 8,525 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 84 individuals from four populations: African-American, European-American, Chinese and Japanese. Individual relationships were reconstructed using the allele sharing distance and the neighbour-joining tree making method. Trees show clear clustering according to population, with the root branching from the African-American clade. The African-American cluster is much less star-like than European-American and East Asian clusters, primarily because of admixture. Furthermore, on the East Asian branch, all ten Chinese individuals cluster together and all ten Japanese individuals cluster together. Using positional information, we demonstrate strong correlations between inter-marker distance and both locus-specific FST (the proportion of total variation due to differentiation) levels and branch lengths. Chromosomal maps of the distribution of locus-specific branch lengths were constructed by combining these data with other published SNP markers (total of 33,704 SNPs). These maps clearly illustrate a non-uniform distribution of human genetic substructure, an instructional and useful paradigm for education and research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162
Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
Parra, E. J., Marcini, A., Akey, J., Martinson, J., Batzer, M. A., Cooper, R., Forrester, T., Allison, D. B., Deka, R., Ferrell, R. E., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302148 · Cited by 771 · cited 1×
“0(15) to be 25 per cent — a reasonable level, given what has been observed in other African-American populations.(22,23) The effect of gene flow is to decrease genetic distance, in this case between the AfricanAmerican and European-American samples.”
ResultSelf-citationModern human origins: progress and prospects
Stringer, C. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.1057 · Cited by 534 · cited 1×
“This is consistent with palaeontological evidence indicating an African origin of our species.(26) Secondly, most human genetic variation is found within populations, while a minor proportion of the total variance is due to differences between continental population groups.”
ResultControl of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations
Hoggart, C. J., Parra, E. J., Shriver, M. D., Bonilla, C., Kittles, R. A., Clayton, D. G., & McKeigue, P. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375613 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Cited by
Sequencing of 50 Human Exomes Reveals Adaptation to High Altitude
Yi, X., Liang, Y., Huerta-Sanchez, E., Jin, X., Cuo, Z. X. P., Pool, J. E., Xu, X., Jiang, H., Vinckenbosch, N., Korneliussen, T. S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1190371 · Cited by 1,611
Detecting Natural Selection in Genomic Data
Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526 · Cited by 694
Genetic variation, classification and ‘race’
Jorde, L. B., & Wooding, S. P. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1435 · Cited by 637
How race becomes biology: Embodiment of social inequality
Gravlee, C. C. (2009) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20983 · Cited by 625
Bigham, A., Bauchet, M., Pinto, D., Mao, X., Akey, J. M., Mei, R., Scherer, S. W., Julian, C. G., Wilson, M. J., López Herráez, D., et al. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001116 · Cited by 597
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shriver, M. D., Kennedy, G. C., Parra, E. J., Lawson, H. A., Sonpar, V., Huang, J., Akey, J. M., & Jones, K. W.
- Venue
- Human Genomics
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 274
- ISSN
- 1473-9542 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-7364
- OpenAlex
- W2074420089
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274
- The paper
- Shriver, M. D., Kennedy, G. C., Parra, E. J., Lawson, H. A., Sonpar, V., Huang, J., Akey, J. M., & Jones, K. W. (2004). The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Human Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.