Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,097

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

Open access
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette, Bluemke, David A, Bremerich, Jens, Flamm, Scott D, Fogel, Mark A, Friedrich, Matthias G, Kim, Raymond J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian, Kramer, Christopher M, Pennell, Dudley J, Plein, Sven, Nagel, Eike·2013·Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

With mounting data on its accuracy and prognostic value, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool with growing utility in clinical routine. Given its versatility and wide range of quantitative parameters, however, agreement on specific standards for the interpretation and post-processing of CMR studies is required to ensure consistent quality and reproducibility of CMR reports. This document addresses this need by providing consensus recommendations developed by the Task Force for Post-Processing of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). The aim of the Task Force is to recommend requirements and standards for image interpretation and post-processing enabling qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images. Furthermore, pitfalls of CMR image analysis are discussed where appropriate. It is an update of the original recommendations published 2013.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1532-429x-15-35

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,097

Metadata

Authors
Schulz-Menger, J., Bluemke, D. A., Bremerich, J., Flamm, S. D., Fogel, M. A., Friedrich, M. G., Kim, R. J., von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., Kramer, C. M., Pennell, D. J., Plein, S., & Nagel, E.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
35
ISSN
1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129655528
Cited by
2,097
References
1
FWCI
53.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1532-429x-15-35
The paper
Schulz-Menger, J., Bluemke, D. A., Bremerich, J., Flamm, S. D., Fogel, M. A., Friedrich, M. G., Kim, R. J., von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., Kramer, C. M., Pennell, D. J., Plein, S., & Nagel, E. (2013). Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-15-35

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.