Cited by 67Epigenetics and DNA MethylationSmoking Behavior and CessationAsthma and respiratory diseases

Multigenerational epigenetic effects of nicotine on lung function

Open access
Leslie, Frances M·2013·BMC Medicine

Abstract

A recent preclinical study has shown that not only maternal smoking but also grandmaternal smoking is associated with elevated pediatric asthma risk. Using a well-established rat model of in utero nicotine exposure, Rehan et al. have now demonstrated multigenerational effects of nicotine that could explain this 'grandmother effect'. F1 offspring of nicotine-treated pregnant rats exhibited asthma-like changes to lung function and associated epigenetic changes to DNA and histones in both lungs and gonads. These alterations were blocked by co-administration of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, rosiglitazone, implicating downregulation of this receptor in the nicotine effects. F2 offspring of F1 mated animals exhibited similar changes in lung function to that of their parents, even though they had never been exposed to nicotine. Thus epigenetic mechanisms appear to underlie the multigenerational transmission of a nicotine-induced asthma-like phenotype. These findings emphasize the need for more effective smoking cessation strategies during pregnancy, and cast further doubt on the safety of using nicotine replacement therapy to reduce tobacco use in pregnant women.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/129.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1741-7015-11-27

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fetal nicotine exposure has transgenerational epigenetic effects on lung function.

    “Recent evidence has been provided for transgenerational epigenetic effects of fetal nicotine exposure on lung function, suggesting that nicotine can create lasting, multigenerational alterations in the epigenome (Rehan et al. 2012; Leslie, 2013).”

    From <scp>N</scp> icotine and the adolescent brain (2015) · cites this paper as Leslie, 2013

    The Transgenerational transmission section reports epigenetic changes in F1 rats and altered lung function in F2 rats after prenatal nicotine exposure. It also says F2 germ-cell epigenetic changes were not examined and that lung-function studies in F3 and F4 are needed to establish true transgenerational inheritance. Thus the evidence supports multigenerational lung effects, but not established lasting, transgenerational alterations of the epigenome. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nicotine can create lasting, multigenerational alterations in the epigenome.

    “Recent evidence has been provided for transgenerational epigenetic effects of fetal nicotine exposure on lung function, suggesting that nicotine can create lasting, multigenerational alterations in the epigenome (Rehan et al. 2012; Leslie, 2013).”

    From <scp>N</scp> icotine and the adolescent brain (2015) · cites this paper as Leslie, 2013

    The Transgenerational transmission section reports epigenetic changes in F1 rats and altered lung function in F2 rats. It says F2 germ-cell epigenetic changes were not examined, so the evidence supports multigenerational effects but does not establish lasting, multigenerational alterations in the epigenome. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, F. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Leslie, Frances M
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2013-02-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080331370
Cited by
67
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
nicotine, maternal smoking, lung function, asthma, DNA methylation, histone modifications, PPARγ, rosiglitazone, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation during pregnancy, gonads
MeSH terms
Animals, Asthma, Female, Fetus, Male, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review