CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 210Dietary Effects on HealthNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intermittent fasting attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and memory impairment.

Open access
Vasconcelos, Andrea R, Yshii, Lidia M, Viel, Tania A, Buck, Hudson S, Mattson, Mark P, Scavone, Cristoforo, Kawamoto, Elisa M·2014·Journal of Neuroinflammation
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-11-85PMC PMC4041059
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic bacterial infections often result in enduring cognitive impairment and are a risk factor for dementia. There are currently no effective treatments for infection-induced cognitive impairment. Previous studies have shown that intermittent fasting (IF) can increase the resistance of neurons to injury and disease by stimulating adaptive cellular stress responses. However, the impact of IF on the cognitive sequelae of systemic and brain inflammation is unknown. METHODS: Rats on IF for 30 days received 1 mg/kg of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline intravenously. Half of the rats were subjected to behavioral tests and the other half were euthanized two hours after LPS administration and the hippocampus was dissected and frozen for analyses. RESULTS: Here, we report that IF ameliorates cognitive deficits in a rat model of sepsis by a mechanism involving NF-κB activation, suppression of the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and enhancement of neurotrophic support. Treatment of rats with LPS resulted in deficits in cognitive performance in the Barnes maze and inhibitory avoidance tests, without changing locomotor activity, that were ameliorated in rats that had been maintained on the IF diet. IF also resulted in reduced levels of mRNAs encoding the LPS receptor TLR4 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in the hippocampus. Moreover, IF prevented LPS-induced elevation of IL-1α, IL-1β and TNF-α levels, and prevented the LPS-induced reduction of BDNF levels in the hippocampus. IF also significantly attenuated LPS-induced elevations of serum IL-1β, IFN-γ, RANTES, TNF-α and IL-6 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results suggest that IF induces adaptive responses in the brain and periphery that can suppress inflammation and preserve cognitive function in an animal model of systemic bacterial infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-2094-11-85

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Design of experiments to determine the effects of intermittent fasting (IF) on cognitive function and hippocampal neuroinflammation. (A) For the biochemical experiments, rats were subjected to IF or ad libitum Control diets for 30 days. To determine whether IF modulated the inflammatory response to a subsequent challenge, rats were injected intravenously with either 1 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline on day 31, and 2 hours later brain tissue and serum samples were collected for subsequent analysis. (B) For the behavioral experiments, rats were subjected to the habituation session of the Barnes maze and were immediately injected intravenously with either 1 mg/kg LPS or saline on day 31. Barnes maze testing sessions and inhibitory avoidance tests were performed on days 32 to 36 and 37 to 38, respectively. Locomotor activity test was performed 24 hours after LPS administration and rotarod tests were performed on days 32 to 35.
Figure 1 Design of experiments to determine the effects of intermittent fasting (IF) on cognitive function and hippocampal neuroinflammation. (A) For the biochemical experiments, rats were subjected to IF or ad libitum Control diets for 30 days. To determine whether IF modulated the inflammatory response to a subsequent challenge, rats were injected intravenously with either 1 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline on day 31, and 2 hours later brain tissue and serum samples were collected for subsequent analysis. (B) For the behavioral experiments, rats were subjected to the habituation session of the Barnes maze and were immediately injected intravenously with either 1 mg/kg LPS or saline on day 31. Barnes maze testing sessions and inhibitory avoidance tests were performed on days 32 to 36 and 37 to 38, respectively. Locomotor activity test was performed 24 hours after LPS administration and rotarod tests were performed on days 32 to 35.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Intermittent fasting (IF) prevents lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced memory impairment in the Barnes maze and inhibitory avoidance task. (A) Barnes maze test results (***P < 0.001 versus IF and IF + LPS groups). Data are represented as the escape latency (time in seconds that the rat takes to find the correct hole containing the burrow). (B) Inhibitory avoidance test results (*P < 0.05 IF test session versus its training session; **P < 0.01 Control test session versus its training session; ***P < 0.001 IF + LPS test session versus its training session; #P < 0.05 IF + LPS versus LPS test sessions). Both tests showed that IF attenuated memory impairment elicited by LPS challenge. (C) Beginning 24 hours after LPS injection, mice were tested daily for motor performance on a rotarod. The latency to fall during the testing period (four days) are shown. (D, E) Results of the analysis of spontaneous locomotor activity in the electronic animal activity meter showing the total locomotion (D) and total rearing (E) 24 hours after LPS administration. N = 8 to 10 for each experimental group.
Figure 2 Intermittent fasting (IF) prevents lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced memory impairment in the Barnes maze and inhibitory avoidance task. (A) Barnes maze test results (***P < 0.001 versus IF and IF + LPS groups). Data are represented as the escape latency (time in seconds that the rat takes to find the correct hole containing the burrow). (B) Inhibitory avoidance test results (*P < 0.05 IF test session versus its training session; **P < 0.01 Control test session versus its training session; ***P < 0.001 IF + LPS test session versus its training session; #P < 0.05 IF + LPS versus LPS test sessions). Both tests showed that IF attenuated memory impairment elicited by LPS challenge. (C) Beginning 24 hours after LPS injection, mice were tested daily for motor performance on a rotarod. The latency to fall during the testing period (four days) are shown. (D, E) Results of the analysis of spontaneous locomotor activity in the electronic animal activity meter showing the total locomotion (D) and total rearing (E) 24 hours after LPS administration. N = 8 to 10 for each experimental group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Lipopolysaccharide LPS) treatment and intermittent fasting (IF) increase the NF-κB nuclear translocation and binding activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and Western blot were performed using nuclear extract (10 μg) from rat hippocampus. (A) Western blot results using antibodies to RELA and β-ACTIN showed that IF and LPS treatment with or without IF increased the nuclear translocation of RELA. (B) EMSA showed that LPS treatment increased the NF-κB binding activity in rats submitted or not to IF protocol. IF by itself also increased NF-κB binging activity. Competition and supershift assays of NF-κB activation by LPS treatment (C), IF (D) and IF with LPS treatment (E) were carried out. Competition studies were performed using the nuclear extract in the absence or presence of unlabeled specific (NF-κB consensus sequence, 20-fold molar excess) or nonspecific (TFIID consensus sequence, 20-fold molar excess) oligonucleotide, as indicated. Supershift assays were performed with the same nuclear extract incubated in the absence or presence of antibodies (1:20 dilution) against subunits p50, RELA, and cREL as indicated. Antibodies were added 20 minutes prior to addition of the radiolabeled NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide. The positions of specific NF-κB/DNA and non-specific (NS) binding complexes are indicated. *P < 0.05 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus IF. N = 5 for each experimental group.
Figure 3 Lipopolysaccharide LPS) treatment and intermittent fasting (IF) increase the NF-κB nuclear translocation and binding activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and Western blot were performed using nuclear extract (10 μg) from rat hippocampus. (A) Western blot results using antibodies to RELA and β-ACTIN showed that IF and LPS treatment with or without IF increased the nuclear translocation of RELA. (B) EMSA showed that LPS treatment increased the NF-κB binding activity in rats submitted or not to IF protocol. IF by itself also increased NF-κB binging activity. Competition and supershift assays of NF-κB activation by LPS treatment (C), IF (D) and IF with LPS treatment (E) were carried out. Competition studies were performed using the nuclear extract in the absence or presence of unlabeled specific (NF-κB consensus sequence, 20-fold molar excess) or nonspecific (TFIID consensus sequence, 20-fold molar excess) oligonucleotide, as indicated. Supershift assays were performed with the same nuclear extract incubated in the absence or presence of antibodies (1:20 dilution) against subunits p50, RELA, and cREL as indicated. Antibodies were added 20 minutes prior to addition of the radiolabeled NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide. The positions of specific NF-κB/DNA and non-specific (NS) binding complexes are indicated. *P < 0.05 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus IF. N = 5 for each experimental group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Intermittent fasting reduces toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced synthase (iNOS) up-regulation in the hippocampus. (A) Levels of Tlr-4 mRNA (*P = 0.008 versus Control; **P = 0.004 versus Control; #P = 0.016 versus LPS). (B) Levels of iNos mRNA (**P = 0.015 versus Control; *P = 0.013 versus Control; #P = 0.045 versus LPS). The mRNA levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR in samples from hippocampus. N = 5 for each experimental group.
Figure 4 Intermittent fasting reduces toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced synthase (iNOS) up-regulation in the hippocampus. (A) Levels of Tlr-4 mRNA (*P = 0.008 versus Control; **P = 0.004 versus Control; #P = 0.016 versus LPS). (B) Levels of iNos mRNA (**P = 0.015 versus Control; *P = 0.013 versus Control; #P = 0.045 versus LPS). The mRNA levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR in samples from hippocampus. N = 5 for each experimental group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Intermittent fasting (IF) inhibits lipopolysaccharide LPS)-induced increases in inflammatory mediators in the hippocampus and serum. Levels of hippocampal IL-1α (A), IL-1β (B), TNF-α (C), IL-10 (D) and RANTES (E), and levels of serum IL-1β (F), TNF-α (G), IL-6 (H), RANTES (I) and IFN-γ (J) were measured by multiplex or ELISA (*P < 0.05 versus Control; **P < 0.01 versus Control; ***P < 0.001 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus LPS; ##P < 0.01 versus LPS and ###P < 0.001 versus LPS. N = 5 to 10 for each experimental group.
Figure 5 Intermittent fasting (IF) inhibits lipopolysaccharide LPS)-induced increases in inflammatory mediators in the hippocampus and serum. Levels of hippocampal IL-1α (A), IL-1β (B), TNF-α (C), IL-10 (D) and RANTES (E), and levels of serum IL-1β (F), TNF-α (G), IL-6 (H), RANTES (I) and IFN-γ (J) were measured by multiplex or ELISA (*P < 0.05 versus Control; **P < 0.01 versus Control; ***P < 0.001 versus Control; #P < 0.05 versus LPS; ##P < 0.01 versus LPS and ###P < 0.001 versus LPS. N = 5 to 10 for each experimental group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Intermittent fasting (IF) prevents lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced depletion of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Levels of BDNF were measured in hippocampal extracts by ELISA (*P < 0.05 versus Control, IF, and IF + LPS groups. N = 10 for each experimental group.
Figure 6 Intermittent fasting (IF) prevents lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced depletion of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Levels of BDNF were measured in hippocampal extracts by ELISA (*P < 0.05 versus Control, IF, and IF + LPS groups. N = 10 for each experimental group.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–209 of 209

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vasconcelos, A. R., Yshii, L. M., Viel, T. A., Buck, H. S., Mattson, M. P., Scavone, C., & Kawamoto, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (BR)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
85-85
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1742-2094-11-85
PMC
PMC4041059
OpenAlex
W2097170254
Cited by
210
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (08/58865-9, 06/57729-9, 2011.1.9333.1.3)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2011.1.9333.1.3)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (#2011.1.9333.1.3)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
intermittent fasting, lipopolysaccharide, neuroinflammation, memory impairment, sepsis, NF-κB, inflammatory cytokines, TLR4, inducible nitric oxide synthase, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, hippocampus, cognitive impairment, systemic bacterial infection, dementia
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Fasting, Gene Expression Regulation, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Memory Disorders, Motor Activity, Psychomotor Performance, Cytokines, NF-kappa B, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Rats, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review