CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 153Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a comprehensive barcode library for arctic life—Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada

Open access
Zhou, Xin, Adamowicz, Sarah J, Jacobus, Luke M, DeWalt, R Edward, Hebert, Paul DN·2009·Frontiers in Zoology
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-6-30PMC PMC2800108
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports progress in assembling a DNA barcode reference library for Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera ("EPTs") from a Canadian subarctic site, which is the focus of a comprehensive biodiversity inventory using DNA barcoding. These three groups of aquatic insects exhibit a moderate level of species diversity, making them ideal for testing the feasibility of DNA barcoding for routine biotic surveys. We explore the correlation between the morphological species delineations, DNA barcode-based haplotype clusters delimited by a sequence threshold (2%), and a threshold-free approach to biodiversity quantification--phylogenetic diversity. RESULTS: A DNA barcode reference library is built for 112 EPT species for the focal region, consisting of 2277 COI sequences. Close correspondence was found between EPT morphospecies and haplotype clusters as designated using a standard threshold value. Similarly, the shapes of taxon accumulation curves based upon haplotype clusters were very similar to those generated using phylogenetic diversity accumulation curves, but were much more computationally efficient. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will facilitate other lines of research on northern EPTs and also bode well for rapidly conducting initial biodiversity assessments in unknown EPT faunas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-9994-6-30

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Trichoptera analyzed in this study. A total of 293 haplotypes represent 1500 COI sequences and 68 morphospecies of Trichoptera. Terminal branches of species with intraspecific divergence greater than 2% are highlighted in red. Species groups with subtle diagnostic characters or females/immatures that are difficult to identify morphologically are highlighted in green blocks. Members of these groups can easily be confused or neglected in routine morphological sorting, but are readily detected via barcoding. Red and pink bars in the outer circles represent the maximum intraspecific divergence and minimum distance to nearest neighbour, respectively, of the corresponding species shown in the circular tree. The heights of the two distance bars are proportional to the distance values (see Table S3 in Additional file 3). Two possible cryptic caddisfly species, Limnephilus sansoni and Cheumatopsyche campyla (Ross), are highlighted in yellow blocks.
Figure 1 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Trichoptera analyzed in this study. A total of 293 haplotypes represent 1500 COI sequences and 68 morphospecies of Trichoptera. Terminal branches of species with intraspecific divergence greater than 2% are highlighted in red. Species groups with subtle diagnostic characters or females/immatures that are difficult to identify morphologically are highlighted in green blocks. Members of these groups can easily be confused or neglected in routine morphological sorting, but are readily detected via barcoding. Red and pink bars in the outer circles represent the maximum intraspecific divergence and minimum distance to nearest neighbour, respectively, of the corresponding species shown in the circular tree. The heights of the two distance bars are proportional to the distance values (see Table S3 in Additional file 3). Two possible cryptic caddisfly species, Limnephilus sansoni and Cheumatopsyche campyla (Ross), are highlighted in yellow blocks.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Ephemeroptera analyzed in this study. A total of 123 haplotypes represent 564 COI sequences and 37 morphospecies of Ephemeroptera. Figure symbols and annotations follow those in Fig. 1.
Figure 2 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Ephemeroptera analyzed in this study. A total of 123 haplotypes represent 564 COI sequences and 37 morphospecies of Ephemeroptera. Figure symbols and annotations follow those in Fig. 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Plecoptera analyzed in this study. A total of 44 haplotypes represent 213 COI sequences and 7 morphospecies of Plecoptera. Figure symbols and annotations follow those in Fig. 1.
Figure 3 Circular Neighbour-Joining tree for unique haplotypes of Plecoptera analyzed in this study. A total of 44 haplotypes represent 213 COI sequences and 7 morphospecies of Plecoptera. Figure symbols and annotations follow those in Fig. 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Barcode haplogroups (2% threshold) compared to morphospecies assignments in species with >2% intraspecific divergence in COI barcodes (in all other cases, the two delineation methods agreed with each other). Clades of focal species were detached from the original haplotype NJ trees presented in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 and reassembled to a pruned tree using the Interactive Tree of Life [29]. The number in parentheses next to the haplotype name indicates the number of sequences sharing the haplotype. The square brackets to the right of the tree represent the haplogroup delineated by a 2% threshold.
Figure 4 Barcode haplogroups (2% threshold) compared to morphospecies assignments in species with >2% intraspecific divergence in COI barcodes (in all other cases, the two delineation methods agreed with each other). Clades of focal species were detached from the original haplotype NJ trees presented in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 and reassembled to a pruned tree using the Interactive Tree of Life [29]. The number in parentheses next to the haplotype name indicates the number of sequences sharing the haplotype. The square brackets to the right of the tree represent the haplogroup delineated by a 2% threshold.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Randomized taxon accumulation curves based on molecular and morphological taxon delineations and total phylogenetic diversity. Taxon accumulation curves based on barcode haplogroups and morphospecies were constructed in EstimateS V.8.0 using 50 random replicates and default settings. The phylogenetic diversity (PD) accumulation curve was constructed in R using the packages APE and CAIC (see Methods and Additional file 4). PD values were multiplied by a scaling factor so the end points of the PD and barcode threshold curves would be the same, aiding comparison of the shapes of these curves. As more Churchill EPT individuals are sampled, biodiversity accumulates at a similar rate regardless of how it is quantified, suggesting that all methods applied here could be used in biodiversity assessment. Barcode clusters are more rapidly obtained and efficiently analyzed than morphospecies or total PD.
Figure 5 Randomized taxon accumulation curves based on molecular and morphological taxon delineations and total phylogenetic diversity. Taxon accumulation curves based on barcode haplogroups and morphospecies were constructed in EstimateS V.8.0 using 50 random replicates and default settings. The phylogenetic diversity (PD) accumulation curve was constructed in R using the packages APE and CAIC (see Methods and Additional file 4). PD values were multiplied by a scaling factor so the end points of the PD and barcode threshold curves would be the same, aiding comparison of the shapes of these curves. As more Churchill EPT individuals are sampled, biodiversity accumulates at a similar rate regardless of how it is quantified, suggesting that all methods applied here could be used in biodiversity assessment. Barcode clusters are more rapidly obtained and efficiently analyzed than morphospecies or total PD.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gaston KJ Blackburn TM Pattern and processes in macroecology 2000 Oxford: Blackwell Scientific

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, X., Adamowicz, S. J., Jacobus, L. M., DeWalt, R. E., & Hebert, P. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Illinois Natural History Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Xin
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Zoology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
30
ISSN
1742-9994 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1742-9994-6-30
PMC
PMC2800108
OpenAlex
W1965466602
Cited by
153
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • Clemson University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Genome Canada
  • Ontario Genomics
  • Ontario Genomics Institute
  • Imperial College London
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
DNA barcoding, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, phylogenetic diversity, species delimitation, Churchill, Manitoba, biodiversity survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review