The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in wearable technology and applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation
Open accessAbstract
The development of miniature sensors that can be unobtrusively attached to the body or can be part of clothing items, such as sensing elements embedded in the fabric of garments, have opened countless possibilities of monitoring patients in the field over extended periods of time. This is of particular relevance to the practice of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wearable technology addresses a major question in the management of patients undergoing rehabilitation, i.e. have clinical interventions a significant impact on the real life of patients? Wearable technology allows clinicians to gather data where it matters the most to answer this question, i.e. the home and community settings. Direct observations concerning the impact of clinical interventions on mobility, level of independence, and quality of life can be performed by means of wearable systems. Researchers have focused on three main areas of work to develop tools of clinical interest: 1)the design and implementation of sensors that are minimally obtrusive and reliably record movement or physiological signals, 2)the development of systems that unobtrusively gather data from multiple wearable sensors and deliver this information to clinicians in the way that is most appropriate for each application, and 3)the design and implementation of algorithms to extract clinically relevant information from data recorded using wearable technology. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation has devoted a series of articles to this topic with the objective of offering a description of the state of the art in this research field and pointing to emerging applications that are relevant to the clinical practice in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, applications in rehabilitation of remote monitoring systems relying on wearable sensors [36] have largely relied upon inertial sensors for movement detection and tracking.”
From A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhancing the quality of life through wearable technology
Park, S., & Jayaraman, S. (2003) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/memb.2003.1213625 · Cited by 615
Physical rehabilitation outcome measures : a guide to enhanced clinical decision making
Finch, E. (2002) · Lippincott Williams & Wilkins eBooks · Cited by 399
Aminian, K., Robert, P. A., Buchser, E., Rutschmann, B., Hayoz, D., & Depairon, M. (1999) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02513304 · Cited by 309
User‐adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee
Herr, H., & Wilkenfeld, A. (2003) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/01439910310457706 · Cited by 294
Motion pattern and posture: Correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers
Foerster, F., & Fahrenberg, J. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200815 · Cited by 188
Detecting absolute human knee angle and angular velocity using accelerometers and rate gyroscopes
Williamson, R., & Andrews, B. J. (2001) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02345283 · Cited by 185
Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: A validation study
Bussmann, J. B. J., Tulen, J. H. M., van Herel, E. C. G., & Stam, H. J. (1998) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577298971153 · Cited by 142
Kay, T., & Huijbregts, M. P. J. (2003) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.2310/6640.2003.35271 · Cited by 139
Automatic assessment of levodopa‐induced dyskinesias in daily life by neural networks
Keijsers, N., Horstink, M. W. I. M., & Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2002) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.10310 · Cited by 139
Is it feasible to reconstruct body segment 3-D position and orientation using accelerometric data?
Giansanti, D., Macellari, V., Maccioni, G., & Cappozzo, A. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.809490 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation
Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L., & Rodgers, M. (2012) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-21 · Cited by 2,396
Self-citationA Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2032660 · Cited by 2,296
Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning
Hausdorff, J. M. (2005) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-2-19 · Cited by 942
The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits.
Mancini, M., & Horak, F. B. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 695
Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors
Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N., Growdon, J., Standaert, D., Akay, M., Dy, J., Welsh, M., & Bonato, P. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2009.2033471 · Cited by 623
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonato, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonato, Paolo
- ORCID
- Bonato, Paolo
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2005-02-25
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC552335
- OpenAlex
- W2095736475
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- wearable sensors, rehabilitation medicine, remote patient monitoring, mobility assessment, physiological signal recording, sensor fusion, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
