Cited by 623Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors

Open access
Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N., Growdon, J., Standaert, D., Akay, M., Dy, J. +2 more·2009·IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a pilot study to assess the feasibility of using accelerometer data to estimate the severity of symptoms and motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was implemented to estimate the severity of tremor, bradykinesia and dyskinesia from accelerometer data features. SVM-based estimates were compared with clinical scores derived via visual inspection of video recordings taken while patients performed a series of standardized motor tasks. The analysis of the video recordings was performed by clinicians trained in the use of scales for the assessment of the severity of Parkinsonian symptoms and motor complications. Results derived from the accelerometer time series were analyzed to assess the effect on the estimation of clinical scores of the duration of the window utilized to derive segments (to eventually compute data features) from the accelerometer data, the use of different SVM kernels and misclassification cost values, and the use of data features derived from different motor tasks. Results were also analyzed to assess which combinations of data features carried enough information to reliably assess the severity of symptoms and motor complications. Combinations of data features were compared taking into consideration the computational cost associated with estimating each data feature on the nodes of a body sensor network and the effect of using such data features on the reliability of SVM-based estimates of the severity of Parkinsonian symptoms and motor complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/titb.2009.2033471

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patel et al. use SVMs to identify patients with PD from accelerometer data.

    “Patel et al. 11 use SVMs to identify patients with PD from accelerometer data.”

    From Machine learning for large‐scale wearable sensor data in Parkinson's disease: Concepts, promises, pitfalls, and futures (2016) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Abstract and Methods section C confirm that Patel et al. used SVMs with accelerometer features. They used them to estimate the severity of tremor, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease, not to identify which people had the disease. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quantitative objective digital tremor biomarkers can support neurosurgeons and neurologists and generate more precise and continuous data.

    “We [7] and others [8][9] have previously shown that quantitative objective digital tremor biomarkers can support neurosurgeons and neurologists and generate more precise and continuous data.”

    From An online movement and tremor identification algorithm for evaluation during deep brain stimulation (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Methods and Discussion and Conclusions (pages unavailable) describe objective accelerometer-based estimates of tremor severity and their potential use in tracking changes relevant to clinical management. The study does not show that the biomarkers support neurosurgeons specifically or that they produce continuous data; its reported recordings lasted 30 seconds, with testing at 30-minute intervals. It also does not establish that the estimates are more precise than clinicians’ assessments. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The feasibility of using data recorded with accelerometers to estimate the severity of symptoms and motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease has been shown recently.

    “The feasibility of using data recorded with accelerometers to estimate the severity of symptoms and motor complications in patients with Parkinson’s disease has been shown recently [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N., Growdon, J., Standaert, D., Akay, M., Dy, J., Welsh, M., & Bonato, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Published
2009-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
864-873
ISSN
1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162592883
Cited by
623
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
38.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0546338)
  • Intel Corporation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS045410, R21NS045401-02)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, motor fluctuations, wearable sensors, accelerometer, tremor severity, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, motor complications, support vector machine, wireless body area networks, feature selection, computational cost
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Aged, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Clothing, Humans, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Telemetry, Video Recording, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Dyskinesias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review