The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns
Open accessAbstract
Evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes has been a matter of long-standing, intensive debate. The introns-early concept, later rebranded ‘introns first’ held that protein-coding genes were interrupted by numerous introns even at the earliest stages of life's evolution and that introns played a major role in the origin of proteins by facilitating recombination of sequences coding for small protein/peptide modules. The introns-late concept held that introns emerged only in eukaryotes and new introns have been accumulating continuously throughout eukaryotic evolution. Analysis of orthologous genes from completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes revealed numerous shared intron positions in orthologous genes from animals and plants and even between animals, plants and protists, suggesting that many ancestral introns have persisted since the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). Reconstructions of intron gain and loss using the growing collection of genomes of diverse eukaryotes and increasingly advanced probabilistic models convincingly show that the LECA and the ancestors of each eukaryotic supergroup had intron-rich genes, with intron densities comparable to those in the most intron-rich modern genomes such as those of vertebrates. The subsequent evolution in most lineages of eukaryotes involved primarily loss of introns, with only a few episodes of substantial intron gain that might have accompanied major evolutionary innovations such as the origin of metazoa. The original invasion of self-splicing Group II introns, presumably originating from the mitochondrial endosymbiont, into the genome of the emerging eukaryote might have been a key factor of eukaryogenesis that in particular triggered the origin of endomembranes and the nucleus. Conversely, splicing errors gave rise to alternative splicing, a major contribution to the biological complexity of multicellular eukaryotes. There is no indication that any prokaryote has ever possessed a spliceosome or introns in protein-coding genes, other than relatively rare mobile self-splicing introns. Thus, the introns-first scenario is not supported by any evidence but exon-intron structure of protein-coding genes appears to have evolved concomitantly with the eukaryotic cell, and introns were a major factor of evolution throughout the history of eukaryotes. This article was reviewed by I. King Jordan, Manuel Irimia (nominated by Anthony Poole), Tobias Mourier (nominated by Anthony Poole), and Fyodor Kondrashov. For the complete reports, see the Reviewers’ Reports section.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, Q., Shai, O., Lee, L. J., Frey, B. J., & Blencowe, B. J. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.259 · Cited by 3,951
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function
Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., & Ast, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2776 · Cited by 1,082
Highly Conserved Non-Coding Sequences Are Associated with Vertebrate Development
Woolfe, A., Goodson, M., Goode, D. K., Snell, P., McEwen, G. K., Vavouri, T., Smith, S. F., North, P., Callaway, H., Kelly, K., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030007 · Cited by 970
Highly Expressed Genes in Yeast Evolve Slowly
Pál, C., Papp, B., & Hurst, L. D. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/158.2.927 · Cited by 635
The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis
Allan Drummond, D., & Wilke, C. O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2662 · Cited by 515
Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G., & Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00558-x · Cited by 445
Self-citationPoole, A. M., Jeffares, D. C., & Penny, D. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006275 · Cited by 274
Complex Spliceosomal Organization Ancestral to Extant Eukaryotes
Collins, L., & Penny, D. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi091 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Endosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Cell Evolution
Archibald, J. M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.055 · Cited by 654
The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited
López-García, P., & Moreira, D. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0710-4 · Cited by 201
Central dogma rates and the trade-off between precision and economy in gene expression
Hausser, J., Mayo, A., Keren, L., & Alon, U. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07391-8 · Cited by 188
Viruses and mobile elements as drivers of evolutionary transitions
Koonin, E. V. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0442 · Cited by 161
Self-citationCoevolution Theory of the Genetic Code at Age Forty: Pathway to Translation and Synthetic Life
Wong, J., Ng, S.-K., Mat, W.-K., Hu, T., & Xue, H. (2016) · Life · doi:10.3390/life6010012 · Cited by 93
The economics of organellar gene loss and endosymbiotic gene transfer
Kelly, S. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.01.322487 · Cited by 62
The economics of organellar gene loss and endosymbiotic gene transfer
Kelly, S. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02567-w · Cited by 62
Protein length distribution is remarkably uniform across the tree of life
Nevers, Y., Glover, N. M., Dessimoz, C., & Lecompte, O. (2023) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02973-2 · Cited by 51
Intron size minimisation in teleosts
Jakt, L. M., Dubin, A., & Johansen, S. D. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08760-w · Cited by 17
Klirs, Y., Novosolov, M., Gissi, C., Garić, R., Pupko, T., Stach, T., & Huchon, D. (2024) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evae181 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogozin, I. B., Carmel, L., Csuros, M., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Biology Direct
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128896349
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.