Cited by 14Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psycho-education with problem solving (PEPS) therapy for adults with personality disorder: A pragmatic multi-site community-based randomised clinical trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairment in social functioning is a key component of personality disorder. Therefore psycho-education and problem solving (PEPS) therapy may benefit people with this disorder. Psycho-education aims to educate, build rapport, and motivate people for problem solving therapy. Problem solving therapy aims to help clients solve interpersonal problems positively and rationally, thereby improving social functioning and reducing distress. PEPS therapy has been evaluated with community adults with personality disorder in an exploratory trial. At the end of treatment, compared to a wait-list control group, those treated with PEPS therapy showed better social functioning, as measured by the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ). A definitive evaluation is now being conducted to determine whether PEPS therapy is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for people with personality disorder METHODS: This is a pragmatic, two-arm, multi-centre, parallel, randomised controlled clinical trial. The target population is community-dwelling adults with one or more personality disorder, as identified by the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Inclusion criteria are: Living in the community (including residential or supported care settings); presence of one or more personality disorder; aged 18 or over; proficiency in spoken English; capacity to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria are: Primary diagnosis of a functional psychosis; insufficient degree of literacy, comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial therapy and assessments; currently engaged in a specific programme of psychological treatment for personality disorder or likely to start such treatment during the trial period; currently enrolled in any other trial. Suitable participants are randomly allocated to PEPS therapy plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU only. We aim to recruit 340 men and women. The primary outcome is social functioning as measured by the SFQ. A reduction (i.e., an improvement) of 2 points or more on the SFQ at follow-up 72 weeks post-randomisation is our pre-specified index of clinically significant change. Secondary outcomes include a reduction of unscheduled service usage and an increase in scheduled service usage; improved quality of life; and a reduction in mental distress. DISCUSSION: PEPS therapy has potential as an economical, accessible, and acceptable intervention for people with personality disorder. The results from this randomised controlled trial will tell us if PEPS therapy is effective and cost-effective. If so, then it will be a useful treatment for inclusion in a broader menu of treatment options for this group of service users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number - ISRCTN70660936.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-12-198

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Data Monitoring Committee of the PEPS trial noted higher rates of mental health-related adverse events (overdose, self-harm and suicide attempts) among those in the active arm of the intervention.

    “the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) of a publicly funded trial of a psychoeducation with problem-solving (PEPS) intervention for community-dwelling adults with personality disorder [1] noted higher rates of adverse events (AEs), specifically mental health-related adverse events (overdose, self-harm and suicide attempts), among those in the active arm of the intervention.”
  • The Trial Steering Committee of the PEPS trial were unable to rule out the possibility that the intervention was instrumental in the excess of adverse events and issued an instruction to stop recruitment into the trial.

    “The TSC were unable to rule out the possibility that the intervention was instrumental in the excess of AEs and so the TSC issued an instruction to stop recruitment into the trial.”
  • In the PEPS trial, the Trial Steering Committee recommended that recruitment and treatment of participants should cease due to the excess number of adverse events relating to mental health in the active treatment arm, although the trial should continue to collect follow-up data on all of those who had already completed treatment.

    “In the PEPS trial, the TSC recommended that recruitment and treatment of participants should cease due to the excess number of adverse events relating to mental health in the active treatment arm of the trial, although the trial should continue to collect follow-up data on all of those who had already completed treatment.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D'Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM, Maydeu-Olivares A: Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R): Technical Manual. 2002, North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc
  2. Basic Skills Agency: Fast Track 20 Questions. 2003, Leicester, UK: National Institute for Adult and Continuing Education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McMurran, M., Crawford, M. J., Reilly, J. G., McCrone, P., Moran, P., Williams, H., Adams, C. E., Duggan, C., Delport, J., Whitham, D., & Day, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Centre for Mental Health (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
McMurran, Mary
Venue
Trials
Published
2011-08-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
198-198
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123393914
Cited by
14
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/53/06)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (08/53/06)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psychoeducation, problem-solving therapy, personality disorders, social functioning, community-dwelling adults, cost-effectiveness, psychological distress, quality of life, service utilization, usual care, community mental health services, International Personality Disorder Examination, treatment acceptability, treatment accessibility, treatment demand
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Personality Disorders, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Research Design, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review