Cited by 24Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Recovery in supported Accommodations: a scoping review and synthesis of interventions for people with severe mental illness

Open access
Bitter, Neis, Roeg, Diana, van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs, van Weeghel, Jaap·2020·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Research on the recovery domains beside clinical recovery of people with severe mental illness in need of supported accommodations is limited. The aim of this study was (1) to investigate which recovery interventions exist for this group of people and (2) to explore the scientific evidence. We conducted a scoping review, including studies with different designs, evaluating the effectiveness the recovery interventions available. The search resulted in 53 eligible articles of which 22 focused on societal recovery, six on personal recovery, five on functional recovery, 13 on lifestyle-interventions, and seven on creative and spiritual interventions. About a quarter of these interventions showed added value and half of them initial promising results. The research in this area is still limited, but a number of recovery promoting interventions on other areas than clinical recovery have been developed and evaluated. Further innovation and research to strengthen and repeat the evidence are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-020-00561-3

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van Weeghel J van Zelst C Boertien D Hasson-Ohayon I Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2019 42 2 169 181 30843721

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitter, N., Roeg, D., van Nieuwenhuizen, C., & van Weeghel, J.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Roeg, Diana
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1053-1076
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W3005263645
Cited by
24
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Five supported housing organisations
  • Storm Rehabilitation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
recovery, supported housing, severe mental illness, personal recovery, functional recovery, lifestyle intervention, creative interventions, spiritual intervention, supported decision-making
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review