Cited by 81Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive–behavioural therapy for health anxiety in a genitourinary medicine clinic: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Seivewright, Helen, Green, John, Salkovskis, Paul, Barrett, Barbara, Nur, Ula, Tyrer, Peter·2008·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the management of health anxiety and hypochondriasis in secondary care settings. Aims: To determine whether cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) along with a supplementary manual was effective in reducing symptoms and health consultations in patients with high health anxiety in a genitourinary medicine clinic. Method: Patients with high health anxiety were randomly assigned to brief CBT and compared with a control group. Results: Greater improvement was seen in Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI) scores (primary outcome) in patients treated with CBT (n=23) than in the control group (n=26) (P=0.001). Similar but less marked differences were found for secondary outcomes of generalised anxiety, depression and social function, and there were fewer health service consultations. The CBT intervention resulted in improvements in outcomes alongside higher costs, with an incremental cost of £33 per unit reduction in HAI score. Conclusions: Cognitive–behavioural therapy for health anxiety within a genitourinary medicine clinic is effective and suggests wider use of this intervention in medical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052936

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the Health Anxiety Inventory as the outcome measure, CBT was found to be cost effective regardless of the form of delivery.

    “Using the Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI) as the outcome measure, CBT was found to be cost effective regardless of the form of delivery.”

    From Cost Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Patients with Severe Health Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Method and Economic evaluation sections use the HAI as the outcome measure and report an incremental cost of £33 per unit reduction in HAI score. They do not establish cost-effectiveness regardless of delivery form: the trial evaluated clinic-based CBT, and its cost-effectiveness varied substantially when intervention costs were changed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results are similar to previous iCBT studies that reported the same tendency but found no statistically significant differences in costs between groups at follow-up.

    “These results are similar to those from the previous iCBT studies [16, 26, 27, 30] that reported the same tendency but found no statistically significant differences in costs between groups at follow-up”

    From Cost Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Patients with Severe Health Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Economic evaluation reports lower service costs in the CBT group, but higher total costs once treatment was included; neither difference was statistically significant. The treatment description says patients attended CBT sessions at the clinic, so this source does not support calling it an iCBT study. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a few studies have examined the costs and cost effectiveness of iCBT programmes for health anxiety, and their control groups, follow-up periods, outcome measures, and methods for economic evaluation differed from those in this study.

    “Only a few studies have examined the costs and cost effectiveness of iCBT programmes for health anxiety [16, 27, 30], and their control groups, follow-up periods, outcome measures, and methods for economic evaluation differed from those in our study.”

    From Cost Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Patients with Severe Health Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Method and Economic evaluation sections describe a cost-effectiveness analysis for CBT for health anxiety, with a control group, 12-month follow-up, and specified outcomes. But the treatment was delivered in therapist-led clinic sessions with a booklet, not as an internet-based CBT (iCBT) programme. This source also cannot establish how its methods differed from those of the citing authors’ study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive behavior therapy is an effective treatment for severe health anxiety and has substantial empirical support.

    “Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for severe health anxiety and has substantial empirical support [6,7,8,9,10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seivewright, H., Green, J., Salkovskis, P., Barrett, B., Nur, U., & Tyrer, P.
Affiliations
  • Kings Mill Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Seivewright, Helen
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-10
Volume
193
Issue
4
Pages
332-337
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2096373733
Cited by
81
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (07/01/26)
  • Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, health anxiety, genitourinary medicine, secondary care, Health Anxiety Inventory, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, social function, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review