Cited by 53Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessAcademic Writing and Publishing

Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors

Open access
Hoffmann, Tammy, English, Thomas, Glasziou, Paul·2014·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A complete description of the intervention in a published trial report is necessary for readers to be able to use the intervention, yet the completeness of intervention descriptions in trials is very poor. Low awareness of the issue by authors, reviewers, and editors is part of the cause and providing specific instructions about intervention reporting to authors and encouraging full sharing of intervention materials is important. We assessed the extent to which: 1) journals' Instructions to Authors provide instructions about how interventions that have been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) should be reported in the paper; and 2) journals offer the option of authors providing online supplementary materials. METHODS: We examined the web-based Instructions to Authors of 106 journals (the six leading general medical journals, 50 randomly selected journals from the National Library of Medicine's Core Clinical Journals, and 50 randomly selected journals from the remainder of the journal collection indexed by PubMed). To be eligible, each journal must have published at least one randomised trial involving human participants each year from 2008 to 2012. We extracted all information related to the reporting of interventions, reporting of randomised trials in general, and online supplementary materials. RESULTS: Of the 106 journals' Instructions to Authors, only 15 (14%) specifically mentioned the reporting of interventions and most of these provided non-specific advice such as 'describe essential features'. Just over half (62, 58%) of the journals mentioned the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement in their author instructions. Seventy-eight (74%) of the journals' instructions mentioned the option of providing supplementary content online as part of the paper; however, only four of these journals explicitly encouraged or mandated use of this option for providing intervention information or materials. CONCLUSIONS: Most journals' Instructions to Authors do not provide any specific instructions regarding reporting of interventions or encourage authors to provide online supplementary materials to enhance intervention reporting. Journals can help to improve the problem of incomplete intervention reporting by providing specific instructions to authors and peer reviewers about intervention reporting and requiring full intervention descriptions to be provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-15-20

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, T., English, T., & Glasziou, P.
Affiliations
Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hoffmann, Tammy
Venue
Trials
Published
2014-01-14
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130158204
Cited by
53
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • e-publications@bond (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bond University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (527500, 1033038)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
intervention reporting, randomized controlled trials, CONSORT statement, reporting completeness, peer review, medical journals
MeSH terms
Authorship, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Quality Control, Writing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Information Dissemination, Editorial Policies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review