Cited by 28Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Collaborative treatment of late-life depression in primary care (GermanIMPACT): study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Open access
Wernher, Iris, Bjerregaard, Frederike, Tinsel, Iris, Bleich, Christiane, Boczor, Sigrid, Kloppe, Thomas, Scherer, Martin, Härter, Martin +3 more·2014·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is not a normal side effect of aging, however it is one of the most prevalent mental health issues in later life, imposing a tremendous burden on patients, their families, and the healthcare system. We describe the experimental implementation of a collaborative, stepped-care model for the treatment of late-life depression (GermanIMPACT trial) in the German primary care context. GermanIMPACT was developed as an adaptation of a successful and widely used American model. The aim of the study is to evaluate the model's applicability to the German primary care setting and its cost-effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing the development of depressive symptoms in primary care patients who either receive treatment as usual (control arm) or treatment according to the GermanIMPACT model (intervention arm). In two German cities (Freiburg and Hamburg), a total of 60 general practice offices will be selected and randomized. Each general practice office will be asked to enroll five patients into the trial who are 60 years of age or older and who show moderate depressive symptoms in the scope of a diagnosed depressive episode, recurrent depressive disorder, or dysthymia. General practices in the control arm will provide treatment as usual; general practices in the intervention arm will work closely with a specially trained care manager and a supervising mental health specialist. Evidence-based elements of the treatment plan manual include patient education, identification and integration of positive activities into the daily routine, relapse prevention, and training of problem-solving techniques as needed. The intervention period per patient will be one year. Data will be collected at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Primary outcome is the patient-reported change of depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9). Secondary outcomes include measures of quality of life, anxiety, depression-related behavior, problem-solving skills, resilience, and an overall economic evaluation of the program. DISCUSSION: The GermanIMPACT trial will provide evidence about the effectiveness, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of collaborative stepped care in treating late-life depression in German primary care. Positive results will be a first step toward integrating specialized depression care managers into the primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00003589 (September 2012).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-15-351

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wernher, I., Bjerregaard, F., Tinsel, I., Bleich, C., Boczor, S., Kloppe, T., Scherer, M., Härter, M., Niebling, W., König, H.-H., & Hüll, M.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Bjerregaard, Frederike
Venue
Trials
Published
2014-09-06
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
351-351
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148438652
Cited by
28
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GY1142)
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
geriatric depression, stepped care, collaborative care, primary care, care managers, cost-effectiveness, depressive symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, resilience, problem-solving skills, relapse prevention, older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Affect, Aged, Clinical Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Cooperative Behavior, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Germany, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Problem Solving, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Research Design, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review