Cited by 35Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational ChangeHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

Process evaluation of appreciative inquiry to translate pain management evidence into pediatric nursing practice

Open access
Kavanagh, Tricia, Stevens, Bonnie, Seers, Kate, Sidani, Souraya, Watt-Watson, Judy·2010·Implementation Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appreciative inquiry (AI) is an innovative knowledge translation (KT) intervention that is compatible with the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework. This study explored the innovative use of AI as a theoretically based KT intervention applied to a clinical issue in an inpatient pediatric care setting. The implementation of AI was explored in terms of its acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility as a KT intervention in pain management. METHODS: A mixed-methods case study design was used. The case was a surgical unit in a pediatric academic-affiliated hospital. The sample consisted of nurses in leadership positions and staff nurses interested in the study. Data on the AI intervention implementation were collected by digitally recording the AI sessions, maintaining logs, and conducting individual semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using qualitative and quantitative content analyses and descriptive statistics. Findings were triangulated in the discussion. RESULTS: Three nurse leaders and nine staff members participated in the study. Participants were generally satisfied with the intervention, which consisted of four 3-hour, interactive AI sessions delivered over two weeks to promote change based on positive examples of pain management in the unit and staff implementation of an action plan. The AI sessions were delivered with high fidelity and 11 of 12 participants attended all four sessions, where they developed an action plan to enhance evidence-based pain assessment documentation. Participants labeled AI a 'refreshing approach to change' because it was positive, democratic, and built on existing practices. Several barriers affected their implementation of the action plan, including a context of change overload, logistics, busyness, and a lack of organised follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this case study supported the acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility of AI as a KT intervention in pain management. The AI intervention requires minor refinements (e.g., incorporating continued follow-up meetings) to enhance its clinical utility and sustainability. The implementation process and effectiveness of the modified AI intervention require evaluation in a larger multisite study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-5-90

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some factors were more important than others in providing the conditions for, and influencing the effect of, implementation interventions, including inter-professional team working (including communication), decision-making authority (mediated by inter-professional tensions), and organizational buy-in.

    “Findings from this study show that some factors were more important than others in providing the conditions for, and influencing the effect of implementation interventions, which included inter-professional team working (including communication), decision-making authority (mediated by inter-professional tensions), and organizational buy-in, issues evident in others' work [e.g., [34,35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jones DA A field experiment in Appreciative Inquiry Organization Development Journal 1998 16 69 78
  2. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model: Adaptability http://www.institute.nhs.uk/sustainability_model/introduction/adaptability.html PMC3827618 24160758

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanagh, T., Stevens, B., Seers, K., Sidani, S., & Watt-Watson, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Kavanagh, Tricia
  • Stevens, Bonnie
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2010-11-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
90-90
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098044024
Cited by
35
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario
  • Sigma Theta Tau International
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
appreciative inquiry, knowledge translation, pediatric pain management, evidence-based practice, PARIHS framework, nursing leadership, surgical wards, implementation fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, barriers to change, pediatric hospital care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review