Cited by 291Health Policy Implementation SciencePatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Quality and Management

Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program

Open access
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Leslie, Myles, Tarrant, Carolyn, Bion, Julian·2013·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality and safety improvement initiatives in healthcare often display two disconcerting effects. The first is a failure to outperform the secular trend. The second is the decline effect, where an initially promising intervention appears not to deliver equally successful results when attempts are made to replicate it in new settings. Matching Michigan, a patient safety program aimed at decreasing central line infections in over 200 intensive care units (ICUs) in England, may be an example of both. We aimed to explain why these apparent effects may have occurred. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 98 staff and non-participant observation on 19 ICUs; 17 of these units were participating in Matching Michigan. We undertook further telephone interviews with 29 staff who attended program training events and we analyzed relevant documents. RESULTS: One Matching Michigan unit transformed its practices and culture in response to the program; five boosted existing efforts, and 11 made little change. Matching Michigan's impact may have been limited by features of program design and execution; it was not an exact replica of the original project. Outer and inner contexts strongly modified the program's effects. The outer context included previous efforts to tackle central line infections superimposed on national infection control policies that were perceived by some as top-down and punitive. This undermined engagement in the program and made it difficult to persuade participants that the program was necessary. Individual ICUs' histories and local context were also highly consequential: their past experience of quality improvement, the extent to which they were able to develop high quality data collection and feedback systems, and the success of local leaders in developing consensus and coalition all influenced the program's impact on local practices. CONCLUSIONS: Improved implementation of procedural good practice may occur through many different routes, of which program participation is only one. The 'phenotype' of compliance may therefore arise through different 'genotypes.' When designing and delivering interventions to improve quality and safety, risks of decline effects and difficulties in demonstrating added value over the secular trend might be averted by improved understanding of program mechanisms and contexts of implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-8-70

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initiatives to improve quality and safety in healthcare frequently result in limited changes for the better or no meaningful changes at all.

    “Initiatives to improve quality and safety in healthcare all too frequently result in limited changes for the better or no meaningful changes at all, and the few that are successful are often hard to sustain or replicate in new contexts.1”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

  • The few successful improvement initiatives are often hard to sustain or replicate in new contexts.

    “Initiatives to improve quality and safety in healthcare all too frequently result in limited changes for the better or no meaningful changes at all, and the few that are successful are often hard to sustain or replicate in new contexts.1”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wachter RM Understanding patient safety (2nd. edition): New York 2012 London: McGraw-Hill Medical
  2. Darzi A High Quality Care for All: NHS next stage review 2008 London: Department of Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixon-Woods, M., Leslie, M., Tarrant, C., & Bion, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
70-70
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153352637
Cited by
291
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
45.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (097899, 097899/A/11/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
patient safety programs, central line-associated bloodstream infection, intensive care unit, quality improvement, decline effect, secular trends, program implementation, context effects, infection control, employee engagement, local leadership, intervention replication
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Catheterization, Central Venous, Critical Care, Cross Infection, England, Humans, Infection Control, Catheter-Related Infections, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review