Cited by 29Health Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Reporting of context and implementation in studies of global health interventions: a pilot study

Open access
Luoto, Jill, Shekelle, Paul G, Maglione, Margaret A, Johnsen, Breanne, Perry, Tanja·2014·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing push for 'evidence-based' decision making in global health policy circles. However, at present there are no agreed upon standards or guidelines for how to evaluate evidence in global health. Recent evaluations of existing evidence frameworks that could serve such a purpose have identified details of program context and project implementation as missing components needed to inform policy. We performed a pilot study to assess the current state of reporting of context and implementation in studies of global health interventions. METHODS: We identified three existing criteria sets for implementation reporting and selected from them 10 criteria potentially relevant to the needs of policy makers in global health contexts. We applied these 10 criteria to 15 articles included in the evidence base for three global health interventions chosen to represent a diverse set of advocated global health programs or interventions: household water chlorination, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, and lay community health workers to reduce child mortality. We used a good-fair-poor/none scale for the ratings. RESULTS: The proportion of criteria for which reporting was poor/none ranged from 11% to 54% with an average of 30%. Eight articles had 'good' or 'fair' documentation for greater than 75% of criteria, while five articles had 'poor or none' documentation for 50% of criteria or more. Examples of good reporting were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of context and implementation information in studies of global health interventions is mostly fair or poor, and highly variable. The idiosyncratic variability in reporting indicates that global health investigators need more guidance about what aspects of context and implementation to measure and how to report them. This lack of context and implementation information is a major gap in the evidence needed by global health policy makers to reach decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-9-57

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luoto, J., Shekelle, P. G., Maglione, M. A., Johnsen, B., & Perry, T.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Luoto, Jill
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2014-05-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112295895
Cited by
29
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • World Health Organization
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
  • Imperial College London
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Peabody College
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSA-290-2007-10062I)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
global health interventions, program context, reporting guidelines, evidence-based policy, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, community health workers, child mortality, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Documentation, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Pilot Projects, Public Health, Research Design, Global Health, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review