Cited by 50Health Policy Implementation ScienceChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and Quality

The Applications of Implementation Science in Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Research and Practice

Open access
Haque, Sabrina S., Freeman, Matthew C.·2021·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delivery of high quality, at-scale, and sustained services is a major challenge in the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) sector, made more challenging by a dearth of evidence-based models for adaption across contexts in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the value of implementation science (IS) for the WASH sector and provide recommendations for its application. METHODS: We review concepts from the growing field of IS-defined as the "scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice, and hence, to improve the quality and effectiveness of health services"-and we translate their relevance to WASH research, learning, and delivery. DISCUSSION: IS provides a suite of methods and theories to systematically develop, evaluate, and scale evidence-based interventions. Though IS thinking has been applied most notably in health services delivery in high-income countries, there have been applications in low-income settings in fields such as HIV/AIDS and nutrition. Expanding the application of IS to environmental health, specifically WASH interventions, would respond to the complexity of sustainable service delivery. WASH researchers may want to consider applying IS guidelines to their work, including adapting pragmatic research models, using established IS frameworks, and cocreating knowledge with local stakeholders. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7762.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp7762

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The motivation to build and use toilets in the homes of children depends on having successful, well-maintained toilets within the study schools.

    “The motivation to build and use toilets in the homes of children depends on having successful, well-maintained toilets within the study schools (Dakhode & Gaidhane 2021;Haque & Freeman 2021).”

    From The level of implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices among the public basic schools in Ghana (2024) · cites this paper as Haque & Freeman 2021

    The Introduction says that underused and deteriorating toilets undermine progress toward safe sanitation, and the Discussion discusses community-level sanitation behavior change. Neither passage addresses whether well-maintained toilets in study schools affect children's households’ motivation to build or use toilets; searches for school toilets and household sanitation found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many students littered their compounds with polythene bags and papers due to the unavailability of waste bins, thereby creating an unhygienic environment.

    “It was highlighted during data gathering that many students littered their compounds with polythene bags and papers due to the unavailability of waste bins, thereby creating an unhygienic environment (Haque & Freeman 2021).”

    From The level of implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices among the public basic schools in Ghana (2024) · cites this paper as Haque & Freeman 2021

    The Introduction and “Challenges of WASH Provision” passages discuss WASH services and sanitation behavior, but do not report observations of students littering. Searches for polythene bags, papers, waste bins, students, and littering found no passage supporting the claimed cause or unhygienic environment. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haque, S. S., & Freeman, M. C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Matthew C.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2021-06
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
65002-65002
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W3167667674
Cited by
48
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES012870)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
implementation science, water, sanitation and hygiene, WASH interventions, evidence-based practice, scaling up interventions, sustainable service delivery, low- and middle-income countries, environmental health, stakeholder engagement, contextual adaptation
MeSH terms
Implementation Science, Hygiene, Sanitation, Water, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review