Cited by 53Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

In the shadow of a new smoke free policy: A discourse analysis of health care providers' engagement in tobacco control in community mental health

Open access
Johnson, Joy L., Moffat, Barbara M., Malchy, Leslie A.·2010·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of tobacco use among individuals with mental illness remains a serious public health concern. Tobacco control has received little attention in community mental health despite the fact that many individuals with mental illness are heavy smokers and experience undue tobacco-related health consequences. METHODS: This qualitative study used methods of discourse analysis to examine the perceptions of health care providers, both professionals and paraprofessionals, in relation to their roles in tobacco control in the community mental health system. Tobacco control is best conceptualised as a suite of policies and practices directed at supporting smoke free premises, smoking cessation counselling and limiting access to tobacco products. The study took place following the establishment of a new policy that restricted tobacco smoking inside all mental health facilities and on their grounds. Ninety one health care providers participated in open-ended interviews in which they described their role in tobacco control. The interview data were analyzed discursively by asking questions such as: what assumptions underlie what is being said about tobacco? RESULTS: Five separate yet overlapping discursive frames were identified in which providers described their roles. Managing a smoke free environment emphasised the need to police and monitor the smoke free environment. Tobacco is therapeutic was a discourse that underscored the putative value of smoking for clients. Tobacco use is an individual choice located the decision to smoke with individual clients thereby negating a role in tobacco control for providers. It's someone else's role was a discourse that placed responsibility for tobacco control with others. Finally, the discourse of tobacco control as health promotion located tobacco control in a range of activities that are used to support the health of clients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the complex factors that shape tobacco control practices in the mental health field and reinforces the need to see practice change as a matter that extends beyond the individual. The study findings highlight discourses structured by power and powerlessness in environments in which health care providers are both imposing and resisting the smoke free policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1752-4458-4-23

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smokers might be less likely to stop if they believe their mental health will suffer.

    “Smokers might be less likely to stop if they believe their mental health will suffer”

    From Change in mental health after smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [24]

    In Results (‘Tobacco is therapeutic’), providers describe quitting as potentially harmful to clients’ mental health. The Discussion links such misconceptions to providers’ reluctance to support cessation. The paper does not establish that smokers who hold this belief are themselves less likely to stop. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a widely held belief among healthcare professionals that smoking cessation should only be attempted after mental health has improved.

    “there is a widely held belief among healthcare professionals that smoking cessation should only be attempted after mental health has improved. 7 , 8”

    From Service‐user experiences of an integrated psychological intervention for depression or anxiety and tobacco smoking in improving access to psychological therapies services: A qualitative investigation into mechanisms of change in quitting smoking. (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results section (“Tobacco Control as Health Promotion”; page unavailable) describes providers who considered clients’ mental-health stability when deciding whether to address smoking, including one who advised a client to postpone quitting because she was not stable. This supports the belief described, but the paper studies community mental-health providers and does not establish that it is widely held among healthcare professionals generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Health professionals might be reluctant to intervene with some smokers because they believe that this might be detrimental to their mental health.

    “health professionals might be reluctant to intervene with some smokers because they believe that this might be detrimental to their mental health.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. L., Moffat, B. M., & Malchy, L. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Joy L.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2010
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
23
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120688112
Cited by
53
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Summit (Simon Fraser University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Collections
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
tobacco control, community mental health, smoke-free policies, healthcare workers, mental illness, smoking, smoking cessation counseling, tobacco access, provider perceptions, discursive frames, power and powerlessness, health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review