Cited by 21Smoking Behavior and CessationCounseling Practices and SupervisionSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Mental health professionals with a specialty in anxiety disorders: Knowledge, training, and perceived competence in smoking cessation practices

Zvolensky, Michael J., Baker, Kristin, Yartz, Andrew R., Gregor, Kristin, Leen-Feldner, Ellen W., Feldner, Matthew T.·2005·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1077-7229(05)80053-7

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zvolensky, M. J., Baker, K., Yartz, A. R., Gregor, K., Leen-Feldner, E. W., & Feldner, M. T.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Zvolensky, Michael J.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
312-318
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071225147
Cited by
21
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation, anxiety disorders, mental health professionals, perceived competence, smoking cessation training, smoking cessation counseling, evidence-based treatment, primary care physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review