Cited by 133Zoonotic diseases and public healthVector-borne infectious diseasesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Wild canids as sentinels of ecological health: a conservation medicine perspective

Open access
Aguirre, A Alonso·2009·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

The extinction of species across the globe is accelerating, directly or indirectly due to human activities. Biological impoverishment, habitat fragmentation, climate change, increasing toxification, and the rapid global movement of people and other living organisms have worked synergistically to diminish ecosystem function. This has resulted in unprecedented levels of disease emergence, driven by human-induced environmental degradation, which poses a threat to the survival and health of biodiversity. The emerging discipline of conservation medicine addresses these concerns through the following entities: humans; global climate; habitat destruction and alteration; biodiversity, including wildlife populations; domestic animals; and pathogens, parasites and pollutants. Furthermore, conservation medicine focuses on explicit linkages between these entities. As a crisis discipline, the usefulness of conservation medicine ultimately will depend on its applicability to solving problems. The perspectives and scientific findings of conservation medicine provide input into biomedical education; and policy and management of ecosystems, habitats and imperiled species. A sentinel species is one that has presented itself, or has been selected, to provide insight into the state (health) of an ecosystem, based on user-defined (e.g., researchers, conservationists or policymakers) objectives (e.g., disease, parasites, toxics, climate change, habitat destruction), coupled with the utility and vulnerability of this species to the perceived stress. The scientific information generated by the sentinel species should empower stakeholders and decision-makers to take mitigative action or support predictive capabilities; the "utility" of the species selected should consider its value and relevance to conservationists and to society at large (e.g., education and outreach; social sciences). Wild canids may serve as excellent sentinel species of emerging canine vector-borne diseases. Several canine vector-borne diseases or antibodies to these pathogens have been identified in wild canids including visceral leishmaniosis, Lyme disease, heartworm, hepatozoonosis and anaplasmosis to name a few. These reports are relatively recent as they relate to wildlife-domestic animal interactions, globalisation, translocations, habitat fragmentation and climate change. These pathogens and their relationship to wild canids are described herein. Further research needs to be performed to elucidate the role of the 36 extant species of wild canids in the epidemiology of canine vector-borne diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-3305-2-s1-s7

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Golden jackals are known as important reservoir hosts for several parasitic and infectious diseases, many of medical or veterinary importance.

    “Golden jackals are known as important reservoir hosts for several parasitic and infectious diseases, many of them having medical or veterinary importance [18, 19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Tabor GM Ostfeld RS Poss M Dobson AP Aguirre AA Soulé ME Orians GH Conservation biology and the health sciences: defining the research priorities of conservation medicine Research Priorities in Conservation Biology 2001 2 Washington, DC Island Press 165 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aguirre, A. A.
Affiliations
EcoHealth Alliance (US)
Corresponding author
Aguirre, A Alonso
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2009
Volume
2
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
S7
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135367795
Cited by
133
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Marisla Foundation
  • Bayer Animal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
wild canids, sentinel species, conservation medicine, canine vector-borne diseases, Lyme disease, Dirofilaria immitis, hepatozoonosis, anaplasmosis, emerging zoonoses, habitat fragmentation, climate change, biodiversity loss, ecosystem health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review