The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChemicalTagger: A tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The primary method for scientific communication is in the form of published scientific articles and theses which use natural language combined with domain-specific terminology. As such, they contain free owing unstructured text. Given the usefulness of data extraction from unstructured literature, we aim to show how this can be achieved for the discipline of chemistry. The highly formulaic style of writing most chemists adopt make their contributions well suited to high-throughput Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches. RESULTS: We have developed the ChemicalTagger parser as a medium-depth, phrase-based semantic NLP tool for the language of chemical experiments. Tagging is based on a modular architecture and uses a combination of OSCAR, domain-specific regex and English taggers to identify parts-of-speech. The ANTLR grammar is used to structure this into tree-based phrases. Using a metric that allows for overlapping annotations, we achieved machine-annotator agreements of 88.9% for phrase recognition and 91.9% for phrase-type identification (Action names). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible parse to chemical experimental text using rule-based techniques in conjunction with a formal grammar parser. ChemicalTagger has been deployed for over 10,000 patents and has identified solvents from their linguistic context with >99.5% precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Chomsky, N. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9783112316009 · Cited by 7,885
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science
Choudhary, K., DeCost, B., Chen, C., Jain, A., Tavazza, F., Cohn, R., Park, C. W., Choudhary, A., Agrawal, A., Billinge, S. J. L., et al. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 · Cited by 1,172
“com/BlueObelisk/chemicaltagger [304] ChemListem https://bitbucket.”
Swain, M. C., & Cole, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207 · Cited by 598
Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning
Kim, E., Huang, K., Saunders, A., McCallum, A., Ceder, G., & Olivetti, E. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 · Cited by 473
Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction
Olivetti, E. A., Cole, J. M., Kim, E., Kononova, O., Ceder, G., Han, T. Y.-J., & Hiszpanski, A. M. (2020) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0021106 · Cited by 302
Information retrieval and text mining technologies for chemistry
Krallinger, M., Rabal, O., Lourenço, A., Oyarzabal, J., & Valencia, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00851 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawizy, L., Jessop, D. M., Adams, N., & Murray-Rust, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cheminformatics
- Published
- 2011-05-16
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111044246
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ChemicalTagger: A tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1758-2946-3-17
- The paper
- Hawizy, L., Jessop, D. M., Adams, N., & Murray-Rust, P. (2011). ChemicalTagger: A tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry. Journal of Cheminformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.