Cited by 598Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesAdvanced Text Analysis TechniquesTopic Modeling

ChemDataExtractor: A Toolkit for Automated Extraction of Chemical Information from the Scientific Literature

Open access
Swain, Matthew C., Cole, Jacqueline M.·2016·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

The emergence of "big data" initiatives has led to the need for tools that can automatically extract valuable chemical information from large volumes of unstructured data, such as the scientific literature. Since chemical information can be present in figures, tables, and textual paragraphs, successful information extraction often depends on the ability to interpret all of these domains simultaneously. We present a complete toolkit for the automated extraction of chemical entities and their associated properties, measurements, and relationships from scientific documents that can be used to populate structured chemical databases. Our system provides an extensible, chemistry-aware, natural language processing pipeline for tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and phrase parsing. Within this scope, we report improved performance for chemical named entity recognition through the use of unsupervised word clustering based on a massive corpus of chemistry articles. For phrase parsing and information extraction, we present the novel use of multiple rule-based grammars that are tailored for interpreting specific document domains such as textual paragraphs, captions, and tables. We also describe document-level processing to resolve data interdependencies and show that this is particularly necessary for the autogeneration of chemical databases since captions and tables commonly contain chemical identifiers and references that are defined elsewhere in the text. The performance of the toolkit to correctly extract various types of data was evaluated, affording an F-score of 93.4%, 86.8%, and 91.5% for extracting chemical identifiers, spectroscopic attributes, and chemical property attributes, respectively; set against the CHEMDNER chemical name extraction challenge, ChemDataExtractor yields a competitive F-score of 87.8%. All tools have been released under the MIT license and are available to download from http://www.chemdataextractor.org .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental data sets extracted from the literature, there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments, leading to challenges in classification tasks.

    “For example, in experimental data sets extracted from the literature (14,15,19), there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments (16, 107, 108), leading to challenges in classification tasks (17).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swain, M. C., & Cole, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Cole, Jacqueline M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2016-10-06
Volume
56
Issue
10
Pages
1894-1904
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2523785361
Cited by
598
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J500380/1)
  • Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
chemical information extraction, chemical named entity recognition, scientific publications, rule-based grammar, chemical identifiers
MeSH terms
Humans, Natural Language Processing, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Periodicals as Topic, Cluster Analysis, Data Mining, Databases, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review