The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creating a honey bee consensus gene set
Open accessAbstract
Background: We wished to produce a single reference gene set for honey bee (Apis mellifera). Our motivation was twofold. First, we wished to obtain an improved set of gene models with increased coverage of known genes, while maintaining gene model quality. Second, we wished to provide a single official gene list that the research community could further utilize for consistent and comparable analyses and functional annotation. Results: We created a consensus gene set for honey bee (Apis mellifera) using GLEAN, a new algorithm that uses latent class analysis to automatically combine disparate gene prediction evidence in the absence of known genes. The consensus gene models had increased representation of honey bee genes without sacrificing quality compared with any one of the input gene predictions. When compared with manually annotated gold standards, the consensus set of gene models was similar or superior in quality to each of the input sets. Conclusion: Most eukaryotic genome projects produce multiple gene sets because of the variety of gene prediction programs. Each of the gene prediction programs has strengths and weaknesses, and so the multiplicity of gene sets offers users a more comprehensive collection of genes to use than is available from a single program. On the other hand, the availability of multiple gene sets is also a cause for uncertainty among users as regards which set they should use. GLEAN proved to be an effective method to combine gene lists into a single reference set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
The genome of the cucumber,Cucumis sativus L
Huang, S., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Li, L., Gu, X., Fan, W., Lucas, W. J., Wang, X., Xie, B., Ni, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.475 · Cited by 1,490
The Genome of the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
Sodergren, E., Weinstock, G. M., Davidson, E. H., Cameron, R. A., Gibbs, R. A., Angerer, R. C., Angerer, L. M., Arnone, M. I., Burgess, D. R., Burke, R. D., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133609 · Cited by 1,132
Self-citationThe yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude
Qiu, Q., Zhang, G., Ma, T., Qian, W., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Cao, C., Hu, Q., Kim, J., Larkin, D. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2343 · Cited by 983
The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line
Xu, X., Nagarajan, H., Lewis, N. E., Pan, S., Cai, Z., Liu, X., Chen, W., Xie, M., Wang, W., Hammond, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1932 · Cited by 785
Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living
Kapheim, K. M., Pan, H., Li, C., Salzberg, S. L., Puiu, D., Magoc, T., Robertson, H. M., Hudson, M. E., Venkat, A., Fischman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4788 · Cited by 409
The tiger genome and comparative analysis with lion and snow leopard genomes
Cho, Y. S., Hu, L., Hou, H., Lee, H., Xu, J., Kwon, S., Oh, S., Kim, H.-M., Jho, S., Kim, S., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3433 · Cited by 312
Genomic diversity and evolution of the head crest in the rock pigeon
Shapiro, M. D., Kronenberg, Z., Li, C., Domyan, E. T., Pan, H., Campbell, M., Tan, H., Huff, C. D., Hu, H., Vickrey, A. I., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230422 · Cited by 265
Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts
D’Souza, C. A., Kronstad, J. W., Taylor, G., Warren, R., Yuen, M., Hu, G., Jung, W. H., Sham, A., Kidd, S. E., Tangen, K., et al. (2011) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00342-10 · Cited by 202
Gao, C., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Yan, D., He, X., Dai, J., & Wu, Q. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-582 · Cited by 175
Lu, L., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Li, X., Chen, W., Tao, Z., Shen, J., Tian, Y., Wang, D., Li, G., et al. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0652-y · Cited by 137
Dong, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, M., Arefnezhad, B., Wang, Z., Wang, W., Feng, S., Huang, G., Guan, R., Shen, W., et al. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1606-1 · Cited by 116
Bian, C., Hu, Y., Ravi, V., Kuznetsova, I. S., Shen, X., Mu, X., Sun, Y., You, X., Li, J., Li, X., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24501 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsik, C. G., Mackey, A. J., Reese, J. T., Milshina, N. V., Roos, D. S., & Weinstock, G. M.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2007-01-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R13-R13
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2159512882
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
