Cited by 137Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The goose genome sequence leads to insights into the evolution of waterfowl and susceptibility to fatty liver

Open access
Lu, Lizhi, Chen, Yan, Wang, Zhuo, Li, Xiaofeng, Chen, Weihu, Tao, Zhengrong, Shen, Junda, Tian, Yong +10 more·2015·Genome biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Geese were domesticated over 6,000 years ago, making them one of the first domesticated poultry. Geese are capable of rapid growth, disease resistance, and high liver lipid storage capacity, and can be easily fed coarse fodder. Here, we sequence and analyze the whole-genome sequence of an economically important goose breed in China and compare it with that of terrestrial bird species. RESULTS: A draft sequence of the whole-goose genome was obtained by shotgun sequencing, and 16,150 protein-coding genes were predicted. Comparative genomics indicate that significant differences occur between the goose genome and that of other terrestrial bird species, particularly regarding major histocompatibility complex, Myxovirus resistance, Retinoic acid-inducible gene I, and other genes related to disease resistance in geese. In addition, analysis of transcriptome data further reveals a potential molecular mechanism involved in the susceptibility of geese to fatty liver disease and its associated symptoms, including high levels of unsaturated fatty acids and low levels of cholesterol. The results of this study show that deletion of the goose lep gene might be the result of positive selection, thus allowing the liver to adopt energy storage mechanisms for long-distance migration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report describing the complete goose genome sequence and contributes to genomic resources available for studying aquatic birds. The findings in this study are useful not only for genetic breeding programs, but also for studying lipid metabolism disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-015-0652-y

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HGFv1 assembly is compatible with current poultry reference genomes.

    “The HGFv1 assembly is compatible with current poultry reference genomes (Dalloul et al. 2010; Shapiro et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2015; ZhOu et al. 2018; Morris et al. 2020).”

    From Genomic Analyses Unveil Helmeted Guinea Fowl (<i>Numida meleagris</i>) Domestication in West Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Lu et al. 2015

    The Results and discussion sections on genome assembly and comparative genomic analysis describe a goose assembly and its comparisons with duck and chicken genomes; they do not assess HGFv1. Searches for HGFv1 and compatibility with poultry reference genomes found no passage addressing that assembly. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, L., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Li, X., Chen, W., Tao, Z., Shen, J., Tian, Y., Wang, D., Li, G., Chen, L., Chen, F., Fang, D., Yu, L., Sun, Y., Ma, Y., Li, J., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Jinjun
  • Wang, Jun
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2015-05-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
89-89
ISSN
1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1488486557
Cited by
137
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-43)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
hepatic steatosis, disease resistance genes, major histocompatibility complex, RIG-I, positive selection, unsaturated fatty acids, cholesterol, lipid metabolism, long-distance migration, waterbirds, comparative genomics, transcriptome
MeSH terms
Animals, Bird Diseases, Birds, China, Fatty Liver, Geese, Gene Expression Regulation, Liver, Male, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Genetic Association Studies, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review