The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system
Open accessAbstract
Background: Tribolium castaneum is a species of Coleoptera, the largest and most diverse order of all eukaryotes. Components of the innate immune system are hardly known in this insect, which is in a key phylogenetic position to inform us about genetic innovations accompanying the evolution of holometabolous insects. We have annotated immunity-related genes and compared them with homologous molecules from other species. Results: Around 300 candidate defense proteins are identified based on sequence similarity to homologs known to participate in immune responses. In most cases, paralog counts are lower than those of Drosophila melanogaster or Anopheles gambiae but are substantially higher than those of Apis mellifera. The genome contains probable orthologs for nearly all members of the Toll, IMD, and JAK/STAT pathways. While total numbers of the clip-domain serine proteinases are approximately equal in the fly (29), mosquito (32) and beetle (30), lineage-specific expansion of the family is discovered in all three species. Sixteen of the thirty-one serpin genes form a large cluster in a 50 kb region that resulted from extensive gene duplications. Among the nine Toll-like proteins, four are orthologous to Drosophila Toll. The presence of scavenger receptors and other related proteins indicates a role of cellular responses in the entire system. The structures of some antimicrobial peptides drastically differ from those in other orders of insects. Conclusion: A framework of information on Tribolium immunity is established, which may serve as a stepping stone for future genetic analyses of defense responses in a nondrosophiline genetic model insect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks.
Henikoff, S., & Henikoff, J. G. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · Cited by 6,218
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs
Chenna, R. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg500 · Cited by 4,875
The Host Defense of Drosophila melanogaster
Lemaitre, B., & Hoffmann, J. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615 · Cited by 3,324
Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity
Lavine, M. D., & Strand, M. R. (2002) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00092-9 · Cited by 1,632
Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates
Bulet, P., Stöcklin, R., & Menin, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x · Cited by 1,107
The Role of Hemocytes in Anopheles gambiae Antiplasmodial Immunity
Ramirez, J. L., Garver, L. S., Brayner, F. A., Alves, L. C., Rodrigues, J., Molina-Cruz, A., & Barillas-Mury, C. (2014) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000353765 · Cited by 1,084
Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera
Evans, J. D., Aronstein, K., Chen, Y. P., Hetru, C., Imler, J. ‐., Jiang, H., Kanost, M., Thompson, G. J., Zou, Z., & Hultmark, D. (2006) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x · Cited by 1,035
Self-citationLPS, TLR4 and infectious disease diversity
Miller, S. I., Ernst, R. K., & Bader, M. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1068 · Cited by 998
Immunity-Related Genes and Gene Families in Anopheles gambiae
Christophides, G. K., Zdobnov, E., Barillas-Mury, C., Birney, E., Blandin, S., Blass, C., Brey, P. T., Collins, F. H., Danielli, A., Dimopoulos, G., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077136 · Cited by 967
Self-citation
Cited by
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Toll-like receptors — taking an evolutionary approach
Leulier, F., & Lemaitre, B. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2303 · Cited by 581
Insect immunology and hematopoiesis
Hillyer, J. F. (2016) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2015.12.006 · Cited by 561
Immunity in Lepidopteran Insects
Jiang, H., Vilcinskas, A., & Kanost, M. R. (2010) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8059-5_10 · Cited by 324
Self-citationHighly diversified innate receptor systems and new forms of animal immunity
Messier-Solek, C., Buckley, K. M., & Rast, J. P. (2010) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2009.11.007 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, Z., Evans, J. D., Lu, Z., Zhao, P., Williams, M., Sumathipala, N., Hetru, C., Hultmark, D., & Jiang, H.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2007-08-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- R177-R177
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2118968404
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r177
- The paper
- Zou, Z., Evans, J. D., Lu, Z., Zhao, P., Williams, M., Sumathipala, N., Hetru, C., Hultmark, D., & Jiang, H. (2007). Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.