Cited by 1,138Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moving pictures of the human microbiome

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the normal temporal variation in the human microbiome is critical to developing treatments for putative microbiome-related afflictions such as obesity, Crohn’s disease, inflammatory bowel disease and malnutrition. Sequencing and computational technologies, however, have been a limiting factor in performing dense time series analysis of the human microbiome. Here, we present the largest human microbiota time series analysis to date, covering two individuals at four body sites over 396 timepoints. RESULTS: We find that despite stable differences between body sites and individuals, there is pronounced variability in an individual’s microbiota across months, weeks and even days. Additionally, only a small fraction of the total taxa found within a single body site appear to be present across all time points, suggesting that no core temporal microbiome exists at high abundance (although some microbes may be present but drop below the detection threshold). Many more taxa appear to be persistent but non-permanent community members. CONCLUSIONS: DNA sequencing and computational advances described here provide the ability to go beyond infrequent snapshots of our human-associated microbial ecology to high-resolution assessments of temporal variations over protracted periods, within and between body habitats and individuals. This capacity will allow us to define normal variation and pathologic states, and assess responses to therapeutic interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Principal coordinates analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances between samples. (a) Costello et al. [6] samples. (b) M3, F4 time series samples. (c) M3, F4 time series, PC1 versus time (days). Panels (a,b) and (c) show two independent principal coordinates analyses. To compare the Costello et al. 454 data (a) with the time series Illumina data (b), these data were generated in a single principal coordinates analysis of UniFrac distances at 500 sequences per sample. Panel (c) does not contain the 454 data, so makes use of the increased sampling depth possible on Illumina (evenly sampled to 5,000 sequences per sample for UniFrac calculations).
Figure 1 Principal coordinates analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances between samples. (a) Costello et al. [6] samples. (b) M3, F4 time series samples. (c) M3, F4 time series, PC1 versus time (days). Panels (a,b) and (c) show two independent principal coordinates analyses. To compare the Costello et al. 454 data (a) with the time series Illumina data (b), these data were generated in a single principal coordinates analysis of UniFrac distances at 500 sequences per sample. Panel (c) does not contain the 454 data, so makes use of the increased sampling depth possible on Illumina (evenly sampled to 5,000 sequences per sample for UniFrac calculations).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Temporal core microbiome. Fraction of species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) composing the core microbiota by number of samples in which an OTU must be present to be considered part of the core.
Figure 2 Temporal core microbiome. Fraction of species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) composing the core microbiota by number of samples in which an OTU must be present to be considered part of the core.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Community membership. Community membership summary for all OTUs in (a) M3 gut, (b) F4 gut, (c) M3 tongue, (d) F4 tongue, (e) M3 left palm, (f) F4 left palm, (g) M3 right palm, and (h) F4 right palm. Points are OTUs colored by their median relative abundance computed over all samples where they occur, and pie charts summarize the class-level taxa observed as persistent and transient OTUs.
Figure 3 Community membership. Community membership summary for all OTUs in (a) M3 gut, (b) F4 gut, (c) M3 tongue, (d) F4 tongue, (e) M3 left palm, (f) F4 left palm, (g) M3 right palm, and (h) F4 right palm. Points are OTUs colored by their median relative abundance computed over all samples where they occur, and pie charts summarize the class-level taxa observed as persistent and transient OTUs.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,138

Metadata

Authors
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Costello, E. K., Berg-Lyons, D., Gonzalez, A., Stombaugh, J., Knights, D., Gajer, P., Ravel, J., Fierer, N., Gordon, J. I., & Knight, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Knight, Rob
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2011-05-30
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
R50-R50
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2126218947
Cited by
1,138
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 61
FWCI
30.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ai070921-07, DK078669)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004872, HG004872, HG004872-02S1)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI070921, AI083264, UH2AI083264)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK078669, P01DK078669)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
human microbiome, temporal variation, core microbiome, microbial community dynamics, body site differences, interindividual variability, microbiome sequencing
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Computer Simulation, Humans, Obesity, Organ Specificity, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Seasons, Time Factors, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Genomics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review