The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Search for a 'Tree of Life' in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest
Open accessAbstract
Background: Comparative genomics has revealed extensive horizontal gene transfer among prokaryotes, a development that is often considered to undermine the 'tree of life' concept. However, the possibility remains that a statistical central trend still exists in the phylogenetic 'forest of life'. Results: A comprehensive comparative analysis of a 'forest' of 6,901 phylogenetic trees for prokaryotic genes revealed a consistent phylogenetic signal, particularly among 102 nearly universal trees, despite high levels of topological inconsistency, probably due to horizontal gene transfer. Horizontal transfers seemed to be distributed randomly and did not obscure the central trend. The nearly universal trees were topologically similar to numerous other trees. Thus, the nearly universal trees might reflect a significant central tendency, although they cannot represent the forest completely. However, topological consistency was seen mostly at shallow tree depths and abruptly dropped at the level of the radiation of archaeal and bacterial phyla, suggesting that early phases of evolution could be non-tree-like (Biological Big Bang). Simulations of evolution under compressed cladogenesis or Biological Big Bang yielded a better fit to the observed dependence between tree inconsistency and phylogenetic depth for the compressed cladogenesis model. Conclusions: Horizontal gene transfer is pervasive among prokaryotes: very few gene trees are fully consistent, making the original tree of life concept obsolete. A central trend that most probably represents vertical inheritance is discernible throughout the evolution of archaea and bacteria, although compressed cladogenesis complicates unambiguous resolution of the relationships between the major archaeal and bacterial clades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663
Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor
Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro751 · Cited by 661
Self-citationeggNOG: automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes
Jensen, L. J., Julien, P., Kuhn, M., von Mering, C., Muller, J., Doerks, T., & Bork, P. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm796 · Cited by 547
Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis
Doolittle, W. F., & Bapteste, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610699104 · Cited by 546
Highways of gene sharing in prokaryotes
Beiko, R. G., Harlow, T. J., & Ragan, M. A. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504068102 · Cited by 535
Cited by
An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems
Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Alkhnbashi, O. S., Costa, F., Shah, S. A., Saunders, S. J., Barrangou, R., Brouns, S. J. J., Charpentier, E., Haft, D. H., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3569 · Cited by 2,480
Self-citationMallet, J., Besansky, N., & Hahn, M. W. (2016) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201500149 · Cited by 586
Castelle, C. J., Wrighton, K. C., Thomas, B. C., Hug, L. A., Brown, C. T., Wilkins, M. J., Frischkorn, K. R., Tringe, S. G., Singh, A., Markillie, L. M., et al. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014 · Cited by 536
Phylogeny of Gammaproteobacteria
Williams, K. P., Gillespie, J. J., Sobral, B. W. S., Nordberg, E. K., Snyder, E. E., Shallom, J. M., & Dickerman, A. W. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01480-09 · Cited by 396
Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea
Zhu, Q., Mai, U., Pfeiffer, W., Janssen, S., Asnicar, F., Sanders, J. G., Belda-Ferre, P., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Kopylova, E., McDonald, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13443-4 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Puigbò, P., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Biology
- Published
- 2009-07-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 59-59
- ISSN
- 1475-4924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140360847
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Search for a 'Tree of Life' in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/jbiol159
- The paper
- Puigbò, P., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2009). Search for a 'Tree of Life' in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest. Journal of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
