The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive
Open accessAbstract
The Water Framework Directive (WFD), 2000/60/EC, requires an integrated approach to the monitoring and assessment of the quality of surface water bodies. The chemical status assessment is based on compliance with legally binding Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) for selected chemical pollutants (priority substances) of EU-wide concern. In the context of the mandate for the period 2010 to 2012 of the subgroup Chemical Monitoring and Emerging Pollutants (CMEP) under the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the WFD, a specific task was established for the elaboration of a technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. The activity was chaired by Sweden and co-chaired by Italy and progressively involved several Member States and stakeholders in an EU-wide drafting group. The main aim of this technical report was to identify potential effect-based tools (e.g. biomarkers and bioassays) that could be used in the context of the different monitoring programmes (surveillance, operational and investigative) linking chemical and ecological status assessment. The present paper summarizes the major technical contents and findings of the report.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2484 · Cited by 13,174
Metagenomics: Genomic Analysis of Microbial Communities
Riesenfeld, C. S., Schloss, P. D., & Handelsman, J. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091216 · Cited by 1,129
Proteome and proteomics: New technologies, new concepts, and new words
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (1998) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.1150191103 · Cited by 1,055
Silva, E., Rajapakse, N., & Kortenkamp, A. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0101227 · Cited by 912
(1996) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203476796 · Cited by 723
Usseglio‐Polatera, P., Bournaud, M., Richoux, P., & Tachet, H. (2000) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00535.x · Cited by 546
Brack, W. (2003) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-003-2139-z · Cited by 438
Self-citationConnon, R. E., Geist, J., & Werner, I. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120912741 · Cited by 300
Self-citationSchäfer, R. B., von der Ohe, P. C., Rasmussen, J., Kefford, B. J., Beketov, M. A., Schulz, R., & Liess, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2039882 · Cited by 277
Comparison of Five in Vitro Bioassays to Measure Estrogenic Activity in Environmental Waters
Leusch, F. D. L., de Jager, C., Levi, Y., Lim, R., Puijker, L., Sacher, F., Tremblay, L. A., Wilson, V. S., & Chapman, H. F. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903899d · Cited by 216
Cited by
Consumer Perception of Genetically Modified Organisms and Sources of Information
Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.115.008870 · Cited by 299
Escher, B. I., Aїt-Aїssa, S., Behnisch, P. A., Brack, W., Brion, F., Brouwer, A., Buchinger, S., Crawford, S. E., Du Pasquier, D., Hamers, T., et al. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.340 · Cited by 267
Self-citationAltenburger, R., Brack, W., Burgess, R. M., Busch, W., Escher, B. I., Focks, A., Mark Hewitt, L., Jacobsen, B. N., de Alda, M. L., Ait-Aissa, S., et al. (2019) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-019-0193-1 · Cited by 267
Self-citationMeftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Post retraction citations in context: a case study
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2242-0 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Wernersson, A.-S., Carere, M., Maggi, C., Tusil, P., Soldan, P., James, A., Sanchez, W., Dulio, V., Broeg, K., Reifferscheid, G., Buchinger, S., Maas, H., Van Der Grinten, E., O’Toole, S., Ausili, A., Manfra, L., Marziali, L., Polesello, S., Lacchetti, I., Mancini, L., Lilja, K., Linderoth, M., Lundeberg, T., Fjällborg, B., Porsbring, T., Larsson, D. J., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Förlin, L., Kienle, C., Kunz, P., Vermeirssen, E., Werner, I., Robinson, C. D., Lyons, B., Katsiadaki, I., Whalley, C., den Haan, K., Messiaen, M., Clayton, H., Lettieri, T., Carvalho, R. N., Gawlik, B. M., Hollert, H., Di Paolo, C., Brack, W., Kammann, U., & Kase, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Sciences Europe
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2190-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-4707
- OpenAlex
- W2169900825
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 27.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12302-015-0039-4
- The paper
- Wernersson, A.-S., Carere, M., Maggi, C., Tusil, P., Soldan, P., James, A., Sanchez, W., Dulio, V., Broeg, K., Reifferscheid, G., Buchinger, S., Maas, H., Van Der Grinten, E., O’Toole, S., Ausili, A., Manfra, L., Marziali, L., Polesello, S., Lacchetti, I., . . . Kase, R. (2015). The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive. Environmental Sciences Europe. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-015-0039-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
