CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Family and Disability Support ResearchGenomics and Rare DiseasesAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The supportive care needs of parents with a child with a rare disease: results of an online survey

Open access
Pelentsov, Lemuel J., Fielder, Andrea L., Laws, Thomas A., Esterman, Adrian J.·2016·BMC Family Practice
DOI 10.1186/s12875-016-0488-xPMC PMC4955113
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parents caring for a child affected by a rare disease have unmet needs, the origins of which are complex and varied. Our aim was to determine the supportive care needs of parents caring for a child with a rare disease. METHODS: An online survey was developed consisting of 45 questions (108 items) and separated into six domains. The survey included questions about perceived level of satisfaction with receiving care, experiences and needs of providing daily care, the impacts of disease on relationships, the emotional and psychological burdens of disease, and parents overall satisfaction with the support received. RESULTS: Three-hundred and one parents from Australia and New Zealand completed the survey; 91 % (n = 275/301) were mothers, with 132 distinct rare diseases being reported. Fifty-four percent (n = 140/259) of parents were dissatisfied with health professionals' level of knowledge and awareness of disease; 71 % (n = 130/183) of parents felt they received less support compared to other parents. Information regarding present (60 %, n = 146/240) and future services (72 %, n = 174/240) available for their child were considered important. Almost half of parents (45 %, n = 106/236) struggled financially, 38 % (n = 99/236) reduced their working hours and 34 % (n = 79/236) ceased paid employment. Forty-two percent (n = 99/223) of parents had no access to a disease specific support group, and 58 % (n = 134/230) stated that their number of friends had reduced since the birth of their child; 75 % (n = 173/230) had no contact with other parents with a child with a similar disease, and 46 % (n = 106/230) reported feeling socially isolated and desperately lonely. Most frequent emotions expressed by parents in the week prior to completing the survey were anxiety and fear (53 %, n = 119/223), anger and frustration (46 %, n = 103/223) and uncertainty (39 %, n = 88/223). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to develop an online survey specifically for use with parents to investigate their supportive care needs across a large and diverse group of rare diseases. The findings highlight that parents with a child with a rare disease have common unmet needs regardless of what disease their child has. Such information may allow health providers to improve child outcomes through improving parental supportive care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12875-016-0488-x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Sources of information considered most helpful to parents
Fig. 1 Sources of information considered most helpful to parentsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Affordability of different needed services at the time of the survey
Fig. 2 Affordability of different needed services at the time of the surveyCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Types of emotions felt by parents in the week prior to completing the survey
Fig. 3 Types of emotions felt by parents in the week prior to completing the surveyCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pelentsov, L. J., Fielder, A. L., Laws, T. A., & Esterman, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Pelentsov, Lemuel J.
ORCID
Venue
BMC Family Practice
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-07-21
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
88-88
ISSN
1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12875-016-0488-x
PMC
PMC4955113
OpenAlex
W2477707385
Cited by
168
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
rare diseases, parents of children with rare diseases, supportive care needs, caregiver burden, social isolation, loneliness, financial stress, job loss, support groups, emotional burden, family relationships
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Australia, Clinical Competence, Emotions, Fathers, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Mothers, New Zealand, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Social Isolation, Social Support, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Satisfaction, Needs Assessment, Uncertainty, Rare Diseases, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review