Cited by 104Iron Metabolism and DisordersPublic Health and NutritionMalaria Research and Control

Prevalence, types and determinants of anemia among pregnant women in Sudan: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Adam, Ishag, Ibrahim, Yassin, Elhardello, Osama·2018·BMC Hematology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia during pregnancy is a public health problem especially in developing countries and it is associated with maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. There is no meta-analysis on anemia during pregnancy in Sudan. The current systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prevalence, types and determinant of anemia during pregnancy in Sudan. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. The databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and African Journals Online) were searched using; anemia, pregnancy related anemia and Sudan. Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) and Modified Newcastle - Ottawa quality assessment scale were used for critical appraisal of studies. The pooled Meta logistic regression was computed using OpenMeta Analyst software. RESULTS: = 0.465) between the anemic and no anemic women. Malaria was investigated in six studies. Pregnant women who had malaria infection during pregnancy were 1.94 times more likely to develop anemia than women who had no malaria infection (OR = 1.94, 95% CI =1.33-2.82). Six (37.5%) studies investigated type of anemia. The pooled prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) among pregnant women in Sudan was 13.6% (95% CI = 8.9-18.2). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of anemia among pregnant in the different region of Sudan. While age and parity have no association with anemia, malaria infection was associated with anemia. Interventions to promote the strengthening of antenatal care, and access and adherence to nutrition, and malaria preventive measures are needed to reduce the high level of anemia among pregnant women in Sudan.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12878-018-0124-1

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several systematic reviews have confirmed that P. falciparum is the highest inhabited organism in pregnancy to cause infection.

    “Several systematic reviews have confirmed that P. falciparum is the highest inhabited organism in pregnancy to cause the infection [7, 22].”

    From Malaria in pregnancy: Meta-analyses of prevalence and associated complications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results section reports an association between malaria infection and anemia in pregnant women in Sudan, but does not compare organisms or malaria species. A References entry names a study of P. falciparum infection during pregnancy; it does not establish the claim that P. falciparum is the most prevalent organism. Searches for that comparison and for the claim’s wording found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, I., Ibrahim, Y., & Elhardello, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Khartoum (SD)
  • University of Tabuk (SA)
  • Scarborough General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Adam, Ishag
Venue
BMC Hematology
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
31-31
ISSN
2052-1839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899558627
Cited by
104
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Hematology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
anemia in pregnancy, prevalence, iron deficiency anemia, malaria in pregnancy, risk factors, Sudan, maternal health, prenatal care, perinatal outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review